Livingston David H, Lavery Robert F, Mosenthal Anne C, Knudson Margaret M, Lee Seong, Morabito Diane, Manley Geoffrey T, Nathens Avery, Jurkovich Gregory, Hoyt David B, Coimbra Raul
Department of Surgery, New Jersey Trauma Center, UMDNJ-New Jersey Medical School, Newark, New Jersey, USA.
J Trauma. 2005 Dec;59(6):1298-304; discussion 1304. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000196002.03681.18.
Age has been shown to be a primary determinant of survival following isolated traumatic brain injury (TBI). We have previously reported that patients > or =65 years who survived mild TBI have decreased functional outcome at 6 months compared with younger patients. The purpose of this study was to further investigate the effect of age on outcome at 1 year in all patients surviving isolated TBI.
The Western Trauma Association multicenter prospective study included all patients sustaining isolated TBI defined as Abbreviated Injury Scale score for Head > or = 3 with an Abbreviated Injury Scale score in any other body area < or = 1. Outcome data included discharge disposition, Glasgow Outcome Scale score (1 = dead to 5= full recovery) and modified Functional Independence Measure (FIM) score measuring feeding, expression, and locomotion (1 = total dependence to 4 = total independence) for each component at discharge and 1 year.
In all, 295 patients were enrolled with a follow-up of 82%, resulting in 241 study patients. An additional five patients died from non-TBI causes and were excluded. The mean and median times for the last follow-up in the 236 remaining patients were 307 and 357 days, respectively. Patients were divided into four age ranges: 18 to 29 years (n = 66), 30 to 44 years (n = 54), 45 to 59 years (n = 50), and > or =60 years (n = 65). More severe TBIs, as measured by admitting Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS), were observed in the youngest group compared with all others but there were no differences in mean GCS between the remaining three groups. There were no differences in neurosurgical intervention between the groups. Age was a major determinant in the outcome at discharge and last follow-up. Patients over 60 years discharged with a GOS < or =4 were less likely to improve at 1 year than all other groups (37% versus 63 to 85%; p < or = 0.05). Patients between 18 and 29 years of age had the lowest mean Glasgow Outcome Scale and discharge FIM scores, which correlated with the low admission GCS. Despite the increased severity of TBI, this group had the best FIM score at 1 year. In contrast, patients older than 60 years had the least improvement and had a significantly lower final FIM score at 1 year compared with all other groups.
Older patients following isolated TBI have poorer functional status at discharge and make less improvement at 1 year compared with all other patients. These worse outcomes occur despite what appears to be less severe TBI as measured by a higher GCS upon admission. Differences in outcome begin to appear even in patients between 45 and 59 years. Further investigations with more detailed outcome instruments are required to better understand the qualitative limitations of a patient's recovery and to devise strategies to maximize functional improvement following TBI. Age is an exceedingly important parameter affecting recovery from isolated TBI.
年龄已被证明是单纯性创伤性脑损伤(TBI)后生存的主要决定因素。我们之前曾报道,与年轻患者相比,轻度TBI存活的≥65岁患者在6个月时功能预后较差。本研究的目的是进一步调查年龄对所有单纯性TBI存活患者1年预后的影响。
西部创伤协会多中心前瞻性研究纳入了所有遭受单纯性TBI的患者,定义为头部简明损伤量表(AIS)评分≥3且其他任何身体部位的AIS评分≤1。预后数据包括出院处置、格拉斯哥预后量表评分(1=死亡至5=完全康复)以及改良功能独立性测量(FIM)评分,该评分测量出院时和1年时每个组成部分的进食、表达和运动能力(1=完全依赖至4=完全独立)。
总共纳入了295例患者,随访率为82%,最终有241例研究患者。另外5例患者死于非TBI原因,被排除在外。其余236例患者的最后一次随访的平均时间和中位数时间分别为307天和357天。患者被分为四个年龄范围:18至29岁(n=66)、30至44岁(n=54)、45至59岁(n=50)和≥60岁(n=65)。与所有其他组相比,最年轻组的入院格拉斯哥昏迷量表(GCS)测量的TBI更严重,但其余三组之间的平均GCS无差异。各组之间的神经外科干预无差异。年龄是出院时和最后一次随访时预后的主要决定因素。出院时格拉斯哥预后量表(GOS)≤4的60岁以上患者在1年时改善的可能性低于所有其他组(37%对63%至85%;p≤0.05)。18至29岁的患者格拉斯哥预后量表平均得分和出院FIM评分最低,这与低入院GCS相关。尽管TBI严重程度增加,但该组在1年时FIM评分最佳。相比之下,60岁以上的患者改善最少,与所有其他组相比,1年时最终FIM评分显著更低。
与所有其他患者相比,单纯性TBI后的老年患者出院时功能状态较差,1年时改善较少。尽管入院时GCS较高表明TBI似乎不太严重,但仍出现了这些较差的预后。即使在45至59岁的患者中,预后差异也开始显现。需要使用更详细的预后工具进行进一步研究,以更好地了解患者恢复的质量限制,并制定策略以最大限度地提高TBI后的功能改善。年龄是影响单纯性TBI恢复的极其重要的参数。