Dutton Richard P, Shih Diane, Edelman Bennett B, Hess John, Scalea Thomas M
R. Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center, University of Maryland School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland 21201, USA.
J Trauma. 2005 Dec;59(6):1445-9. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000198373.97217.94.
BACKGROUND: Uncrossmatched type-O packed red blood cells (UORBC) are recommended for immediate transfusion in hemorrhaging trauma patients. The potential for alloimmunization with this technique is controversial, and has been reported to be as high as 80%. We examined a 1-year experience with UORBC transfusion to determine the incidence of allergic reaction and alloimmunization. METHODS: Blood Bank and Trauma Registry databases for the year 2000 were linked to determine the incidence of UORBC use and the characteristics of patients, including the incidence of transfusion reactions and seroconversion of Rh-patients. Ten units of type-O, Rh+ blood (and two units of O-blood for women of childbearing age) were available for immediate transfusion, 30 to 45 minutes sooner than type-specific or crossmatched red blood cells. UORBC were administered to any patient with signs of severe hemorrhagic shock, at the discretion of the attending physician. RESULTS: In all, 480 trauma patients (out of 5,623 admitted) received transfusions of RBC, totaling 5,203 units. Five hundred eighty-one units of UORBC were given to 161 patients. Average Injury Severity Score in the UORBC cohort was 33.8. Patients receiving UORBC received an average of 16.9 total units of red blood cells, 14 units of plasma, and 10 units of platelets. Seventy-three patients died (45%). There were no acute hemolytic transfusion reactions observed in the patients who received UORBC. Four Rh-women received UORBC, all O-. Ten Rh-men received O+ blood, and only one developed antibodies to the Rh antigen. CONCLUSION: The need for UORBC is associated with significant injury and the need for subsequent massive transfusion. In this largest reported trauma series, the use of UORBC enabled rapid administration of red cells to hemorrhaging patients, without discernible risk for transfusion-related complications. The rate of seroconversion of Rh-patients is lower than reported in the literature, perhaps due to immune suppression associated with hemorrhagic shock.
背景:对于出血性创伤患者,推荐输注未交叉配型的O型浓缩红细胞(UORBC)进行紧急输血。采用这种技术发生同种免疫的可能性存在争议,据报道发生率高达80%。我们研究了1年中UORBC输血的情况,以确定过敏反应和同种免疫的发生率。 方法:将2000年血库和创伤登记数据库相链接,以确定UORBC的使用发生率以及患者的特征,包括输血反应的发生率和Rh阴性患者的血清转化情况。有10单位O型Rh阳性血(以及2单位O型血供育龄期女性使用)可用于紧急输血,比输注血型特异性或交叉配型的红细胞快30至45分钟。主治医生可自行决定将UORBC输注给任何有严重失血性休克体征的患者。 结果:总计5623名入院患者中有480名创伤患者接受了红细胞输血,共输注5203单位。161名患者接受了581单位的UORBC。接受UORBC的患者队列中平均损伤严重程度评分为33.8。接受UORBC的患者平均共接受16.9单位红细胞、14单位血浆和10单位血小板。73名患者死亡(45%)。接受UORBC的患者未观察到急性溶血性输血反应。4名Rh阴性女性接受了UORBC,均为O型阴性。10名Rh阳性男性接受了O型阳性血,只有1人产生了针对Rh抗原的抗体。 结论:使用UORBC的需求与严重损伤及后续大量输血的需求相关。在这个已报道的最大规模创伤系列研究中,使用UORBC能够快速将红细胞输注给出血患者,且未发现明显的输血相关并发症风险。Rh阴性患者的血清转化率低于文献报道,这可能是由于与失血性休克相关的免疫抑制。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012-1
Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2025-4-16
Transfus Med Hemother. 2018-5
Int J Crit Illn Inj Sci. 2016