Suppr超能文献

多发伤患者中不匹配的O型RhD阳性红细胞

Unmatched Type O RhD+ Red Blood Cells in Multiple Injured Patients.

作者信息

Flommersfeld Sabine, Mand Carsten, Kühne Christian A, Bein Gregor, Ruchholtz Steffen, Sachs Ulrich J

机构信息

Center for Transfusion Medicine and Hemotherapy, University Hospital Gießen and Marburg, Marburg Campus, Marburg, Germany.

Department of Trauma, Hand and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Gießen and Marburg, Campus Marburg, Marburg, Germany.

出版信息

Transfus Med Hemother. 2018 May;45(3):158-161. doi: 10.1159/000485388. Epub 2018 Mar 7.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Immediate supply of red blood cell (RBC) concentrates is crucial in the initial treatment of exsanguinating patients in the emergency room. General shortage of RhD- RBCs has led to protocols in which patients with unknown blood groups are initially transfused with group O, RhD+ RBCs. Limited data are available regarding the safety of such an approach.

METHODS

Transfusion protocols for all multiple injured patients from the regional polytrauma database were retrospectively analyzed over a period of 5 years. Data on side effects were retrieved from the local safety update registry. Follow-up data were obtained from patients with identified RhD-incompatible transfusions.

RESULTS

In total, 823 patients were registered as multiple injured in the database. An immediate transfusion of 259 units (mean number of units 4, range 1-6) group O, RhD+ RBCs was initiated in 62 of them. 14 of these patients were RhD- and received 60 units of RhD-incompatible RBCs in the emergency room. In the later course RhD- patients received additional 185 incompatible transfusions (13; 1-31). The overall seroconversion rate was 50%. No adverse outcome due to incompatible transfusion was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Initial supply with group O, RhD+ RBCs in multiple injured patients appears to be safe. Significant numbers of RhD- units can be saved for use in other patients.

摘要

背景

在急诊室对大出血患者进行初始治疗时,立即供应红细胞浓缩液至关重要。RhD阴性红细胞普遍短缺,导致了一些方案,即血型未知的患者最初输注O型RhD阳性红细胞。关于这种方法的安全性,现有数据有限。

方法

回顾性分析了区域多发伤数据库中所有多发伤患者5年期间的输血方案。从当地安全更新登记处获取副作用数据。从确定为RhD血型不合输血的患者中获取随访数据。

结果

数据库中共登记了823例多发伤患者。其中62例患者立即输注了259单位(平均单位数4,范围1 - 6)O型RhD阳性红细胞。这些患者中有14例为RhD阴性,在急诊室接受了60单位RhD血型不合的红细胞。在后续过程中,RhD阴性患者又接受了185次不相容输血(13次;1 - 31次)。总体血清转化率为50%。未观察到因血型不合输血导致的不良后果。

结论

对多发伤患者初始供应O型RhD阳性红细胞似乎是安全的。大量RhD阴性单位可节省下来供其他患者使用。

相似文献

1
Unmatched Type O RhD+ Red Blood Cells in Multiple Injured Patients.多发伤患者中不匹配的O型RhD阳性红细胞
Transfus Med Hemother. 2018 May;45(3):158-161. doi: 10.1159/000485388. Epub 2018 Mar 7.
8
RhD-Alloimmunization in Adult and Pediatric Trauma Patients.成人和儿科创伤患者的 RhD 同种免疫。
Transfus Med Rev. 2024 Oct;38(4):150842. doi: 10.1016/j.tmrv.2024.150842. Epub 2024 Jul 10.

引用本文的文献

3
Management of Wrong Blood Transfusion to an RhD Negative Woman in Labor.对分娩期RhD阴性女性误输血型的处理
Int J Womens Health. 2023 Jan 4;15:1-6. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S390661. eCollection 2023.
7
Hemovigilance.血液警戒
Transfus Med Hemother. 2018 May;45(3):148-150. doi: 10.1159/000490075. Epub 2018 May 24.

本文引用的文献

7
Emergency uncrossmatched transfusion effect on blood type alloantibodies.急诊非同型输血对血型同种抗体的影响。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Jan;72(1):48-52; discussion 52-3. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e31823f0465.
8
Transfusion medicine in trauma patients.创伤患者的输血医学。
Expert Rev Hematol. 2008 Oct;1(1):99-109. doi: 10.1586/17474086.1.1.99.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验