• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

晚期疾病悲伤或抑郁量表(TIGDS)的编制与初步验证

The development and initial validation of the Terminally Ill Grief or Depression Scale (TIGDS).

作者信息

Periyakoil Vyjeyanthi S, Kraemer Helena C, Noda Art, Moos Rudolf, Hallenbeck James, Webster Maria, Yesavage Jerome A

机构信息

Palo Alto Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Palo Alto 94304, USA.

出版信息

Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2005;14(4):202-12. doi: 10.1002/mpr.8.

DOI:10.1002/mpr.8
PMID:16395873
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6878415/
Abstract

Patients often experience 'preparatory-grief' as they cope with the dying process. Some may be depressed. The Terminally Ill Grief or Depression Scale (TIGDS), comprising grief and depression sub-scales, is a new self-report measure designed to differentiate between preparatory-grief and depression in adult inpatients. The initial 100-item inventory was assembled based on literature review, interviews with clinicians and dying patients and then shortened to 42 items based on consensus expert opinion. Validity and reliability were tested in a sample of 55 terminally ill adults. The consensus clinical opinion was used as the gold standard to differentiate between preparatory grief and depression. The intra-class correlation coefficient was high (it was calculated to estimate the test-retest reliability for the 47 patients who had completed the TIGDS twice--retest was administered 2 to 7 days after the initial test), ranging from 0.86 (grief) to 0.97 (depression). The validity of TIGDS was assessed using a receiver operating characteristic curve analysis, comparing the first test with the clinical criterion. The first and only variable and cut-point was the depression score (chi-square = 18.4, p < 0.001, cut point = 3). The sensitivity of the TIGDS was 0.727 and specificity was 0.886 for the depression = 3 cutoff score. The construct validity of the TIGDS was tested by comparing with the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). The TIGDS depression subscale showed strong convergent validity and the TIGDS grief subscale showed strong discriminant validity with the HADS total score.

摘要

患者在应对死亡过程时常常经历“临终前悲伤”。有些人可能会抑郁。晚期疾病悲伤或抑郁量表(TIGDS)由悲伤和抑郁分量表组成,是一种新的自我报告测量工具,旨在区分成年住院患者的临终前悲伤和抑郁。最初的100项问卷是基于文献综述、对临床医生和临终患者的访谈编制而成,然后根据专家共识意见缩短至42项。在55名晚期成年患者样本中测试了其有效性和可靠性。以临床专家共识意见作为区分临终前悲伤和抑郁的金标准。组内相关系数较高(计算该系数是为了估计47名完成两次TIGDS测试的患者的重测信度——在初次测试后2至7天进行重测),范围从0.86(悲伤)到0.97(抑郁)。使用受试者工作特征曲线分析评估TIGDS的有效性,将初次测试结果与临床标准进行比较。第一个也是唯一的变量和切点是抑郁得分(卡方 = 18.4,p < 0.001,切点 = 3)。对于抑郁得分 = 3的临界值,TIGDS的敏感性为0.727,特异性为0.886。通过与医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS)比较来测试TIGDS的结构效度。TIGDS抑郁分量表显示出很强的收敛效度,TIGDS悲伤分量表与HADS总分显示出很强的区分效度。

相似文献

1
The development and initial validation of the Terminally Ill Grief or Depression Scale (TIGDS).晚期疾病悲伤或抑郁量表(TIGDS)的编制与初步验证
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res. 2005;14(4):202-12. doi: 10.1002/mpr.8.
2
Screening for preparatory grief in advanced cancer patients.晚期癌症患者的预备性悲伤筛查。
Cancer Nurs. 2008 Jul-Aug;31(4):326-32. doi: 10.1097/01.NCC.0000305749.50991.b1.
3
Life before death: identifying preparatory grief through the development of a new measurement in advanced cancer patients (PGAC).死亡前的生活:通过开发一种针对晚期癌症患者的新测量方法(PGAC)来识别预备性悲伤。
Support Care Cancer. 2005 Oct;13(10):834-41. doi: 10.1007/s00520-005-0797-4. Epub 2005 Apr 28.
4
Preparatory grief, psychological distress and hopelessness in advanced cancer patients.晚期癌症患者的预备性悲伤、心理困扰与绝望感
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2008 Mar;17(2):145-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2354.2007.00825.x.
5
Advanced Cancer Patients' Perceptions of Dignity: The Impact of Psychologically Distressing Symptoms and Preparatory Grief.晚期癌症患者对尊严的认知:心理困扰症状和预感性悲伤的影响
J Palliat Care. 2018 Apr;33(2):88-94. doi: 10.1177/0825859718759882. Epub 2018 Mar 7.
6
Validity and Reliability of Screening Measures for Depression and Anxiety Disorders in Rheumatoid Arthritis.类风湿关节炎中抑郁和焦虑障碍筛查工具的有效性和可靠性。
Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2020 Aug;72(8):1130-1139. doi: 10.1002/acr.24011. Epub 2020 Jul 8.
7
Discriminant validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, Beck Depression Inventory (II) and Beck Anxiety Inventory to confirmed clinical diagnosis of depression and anxiety in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.医院焦虑抑郁量表、贝克抑郁量表(第二版)及贝克焦虑量表对慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者抑郁和焦虑确诊临床诊断的区分效度。
Chron Respir Dis. 2016 Aug;13(3):220-8. doi: 10.1177/1479972316634604. Epub 2016 Mar 3.
8
Screening for anxiety and depression in dialysis patients: comparison of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and the Beck Depression Inventory.透析患者焦虑和抑郁的筛查:医院焦虑和抑郁量表与贝克抑郁量表的比较。
J Psychosom Res. 2012 Aug;73(2):139-44. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychores.2012.04.015. Epub 2012 Jun 11.
9
Assessing and managing depression in the terminally ill patient. ACP-ASIM End-of-Life Care Consensus Panel. American College of Physicians - American Society of Internal Medicine.评估和管理晚期患者的抑郁症。美国内科医师学会-美国内科医学学会临终关怀共识小组。
Ann Intern Med. 2000 Feb 1;132(3):209-18. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-132-3-200002010-00007.
10
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale-Anxiety subscale (HADS-A) and The State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) accuracy for anxiety disorders detection in drug-resistant mesial temporal lobe epilepsy patients.医院焦虑和抑郁量表-焦虑分量表(HADS-A)和状态-特质焦虑量表(STAI)在耐药性内侧颞叶癫痫患者焦虑障碍检测中的准确性。
J Affect Disord. 2019 Mar 1;246:452-457. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.12.072. Epub 2018 Dec 24.

引用本文的文献

1
Coping strategies of patients with advanced lung or colorectal cancer in six European countries: Insights from the ACTION Study.六位患有晚期肺癌或结直肠癌的欧洲患者的应对策略:来自 ACTION 研究的见解。
Psychooncology. 2020 Feb;29(2):347-355. doi: 10.1002/pon.5259. Epub 2019 Nov 20.
2
Rational Suicide in Late Life: A Systematic Review of the Literature.老年期理性自杀:文献系统综述。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2019 Sep 29;55(10):656. doi: 10.3390/medicina55100656.
3
DTI measures identify mild and moderate TBI cases among patients with complex health problems: A receiver operating characteristic analysis of U.S. veterans.弥散张量成像测量可在患有复杂健康问题的患者中识别轻度和中度创伤性脑损伤病例:一项针对美国退伍军人的受试者工作特征分析。
Neuroimage Clin. 2017 Jun 24;16:1-16. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2017.06.031. eCollection 2017.
4
Assessing Preparatory Grief in Advanced Cancer Patients as an Independent Predictor of Distress in an American Population.评估晚期癌症患者的预备性悲伤作为美国人群中痛苦的独立预测因素。
J Palliat Med. 2017 Jan;20(1):48-52. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2016.0136. Epub 2016 Sep 1.
5
Measuring grief and depression in seriously ill outpatients using the Palliative Grief Depression Scale.使用姑息性悲伤抑郁量表测量重症门诊患者的悲伤和抑郁情绪。
J Palliat Med. 2012 Dec;15(12):1350-5. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2012.0280. Epub 2012 Oct 15.
6
Differentiating grief and depression in patients who are seriously ill.区分重症患者的悲伤与抑郁。
Am Fam Physician. 2012 Aug 1;86(3):232, 234.
7
Do rates of mental disorders and existential distress among advanced stage cancer patients increase as death approaches?晚期癌症患者的精神障碍和存在性痛苦发生率会随着死亡临近而增加吗?
Psychooncology. 2009 Jan;18(1):50-61. doi: 10.1002/pon.1371.

本文引用的文献

1
A rating scale for depression.一种抑郁症评定量表。
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1960 Feb;23(1):56-62. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.23.1.56.
2
Kappa coefficients in medical research.医学研究中的卡帕系数。
Stat Med. 2002 Jul 30;21(14):2109-29. doi: 10.1002/sim.1180.
3
Exploring the perspectives of people whose lives have been affected by depression.探索那些生活受到抑郁症影响的人们的观点。
Med J Aust. 2002 May 20;176(10):S69-76. doi: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2002.tb04507.x.
4
Defining guilt in depression: a comparison of subjects with major depression, chronic medical illness and healthy controls.界定抑郁症中的内疚感:重度抑郁症患者、慢性疾病患者与健康对照者的比较
J Affect Disord. 2002 Apr;68(2-3):307-15. doi: 10.1016/s0165-0327(01)00335-4.
5
Depression in advanced disease: a systematic review Part 1. Prevalence and case finding.晚期疾病中的抑郁症:系统评价 第1部分。患病率与病例发现。
Palliat Med. 2002 Mar;16(2):81-97. doi: 10.1191/02169216302pm507oa.
6
Predicting depressive symptoms with a new measure of shame: The Experience of Shame Scale.用一种新的羞耻感测量方法预测抑郁症状:羞耻体验量表。
Br J Clin Psychol. 2002 Mar;41(Pt 1):29-42. doi: 10.1348/014466502163778.
7
Identifying and managing preparatory grief and depression at the end of life.识别并处理临终前的预备性悲伤和抑郁。
Am Fam Physician. 2002 Mar 1;65(5):883-90.
8
An analysis of the validity of the Hospital Anxiety and Depression scale as a screening tool in patients with advanced metastatic cancer.
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2001 Dec;22(6):990-6. doi: 10.1016/s0885-3924(01)00358-x.
9
Stigma as a barrier to recovery: Perceived stigma and patient-rated severity of illness as predictors of antidepressant drug adherence.耻辱感作为康复的障碍:感知到的耻辱感和患者自评疾病严重程度作为抗抑郁药物依从性的预测因素。
Psychiatr Serv. 2001 Dec;52(12):1615-20. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.52.12.1615.
10
Improving depression care: barriers, solutions, and research needs.改善抑郁症护理:障碍、解决方案及研究需求。
J Fam Pract. 2001 Jun;50(6):E1.