• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

干扰项熟悉度有助于更高效地对复杂刺激进行视觉搜索。

Distractor familiarity leads to more efficient visual search for complex stimuli.

作者信息

Mruczek Ryan E B, Sheinberg David L

机构信息

Brown University, Providence, Rhode Island 02910, USA.

出版信息

Percept Psychophys. 2005 Aug;67(6):1016-31. doi: 10.3758/bf03193628.

DOI:10.3758/bf03193628
PMID:16396010
Abstract

Previous reports suggest that distractor familiarity plays an important role in determining visual search efficiency. However, the specific tasks used in those studies limit the extension of their findings to real-world situations and everyday images. In the present study, subjects engaged in a prolonged period of search experience as a control of their level of familiarity with a large set of target and distractor images. Reaction times and search slopes decreased dramatically over this period, especially for trials with a large target eccentricity and many distractors. Following extended practice, search among familiar distractors was more efficient than search among unfamiliar distractors. Furthermore, we found that familiar targets were located more efficiently than unfamiliar targets and that subjects were faster at locating targets that they had experienced in the majority of the search trials. These results show that prolonged visual experience facilitates processing of both target and distractor items during search.

摘要

先前的报告表明,干扰项的熟悉程度在决定视觉搜索效率方面起着重要作用。然而,这些研究中使用的特定任务限制了其研究结果向现实世界情境和日常图像的扩展。在本研究中,受试者经历了长时间的搜索体验,以控制他们对大量目标和干扰项图像的熟悉程度。在此期间,反应时间和搜索斜率大幅下降,尤其是对于目标偏心度大且干扰项多的试验。经过长时间练习后,在熟悉的干扰项中进行搜索比在不熟悉的干扰项中进行搜索更有效。此外,我们发现熟悉的目标比不熟悉的目标定位得更有效,并且受试者在定位他们在大多数搜索试验中经历过的目标时速度更快。这些结果表明,长时间的视觉体验有助于在搜索过程中对目标和干扰项进行处理。

相似文献

1
Distractor familiarity leads to more efficient visual search for complex stimuli.干扰项熟悉度有助于更高效地对复杂刺激进行视觉搜索。
Percept Psychophys. 2005 Aug;67(6):1016-31. doi: 10.3758/bf03193628.
2
Visual search asymmetry depends on target-distractor feature similarity: Is the asymmetry simply a result of distractor rejection speed?视觉搜索不对称性取决于目标-干扰项特征相似性:这种不对称性仅仅是干扰项排除速度的结果吗?
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2020 Jan;82(1):80-97. doi: 10.3758/s13414-019-01818-0.
3
The hard-won benefits of familiarity in visual search: naturally familiar brand logos are found faster.视觉搜索中熟悉度带来的来之不易的好处:自然熟悉的品牌标志被发现得更快。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2014 May;76(4):914-30. doi: 10.3758/s13414-014-0623-5.
4
You look familiar, but I don't care: Lure rejection in hybrid visual and memory search is not based on familiarity.你看起来很面熟,但我不在乎:混合视觉与记忆搜索中的诱饵排斥并非基于熟悉度。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2015 Dec;41(6):1576-87. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000096. Epub 2015 Jul 20.
5
Target familiarity and visual working memory do not influence familiarity effect in visual search.目标熟悉度和视觉工作记忆不会影响视觉搜索中的熟悉效应。
Sci Rep. 2021 Apr 7;11(1):7560. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-86669-2.
6
Efficient visual search for multiple targets among categorical distractors: effects of distractor-distractor similarity across trials.在分类干扰物中对多个目标进行高效视觉搜索:不同试验中干扰物-干扰物相似性的影响
Vision Res. 2014 Mar;96:96-105. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2014.01.009. Epub 2014 Jan 31.
7
Visual search asymmetry: the influence of stimulus familiarity and low-level features.视觉搜索不对称性:刺激熟悉度和低层次特征的影响
Percept Psychophys. 2001 Apr;63(3):464-75. doi: 10.3758/bf03194413.
8
Target templates in low target-distractor discriminability visual search have higher resolution, but the advantage they provide is short-lived.低目标-分心物辨别力视觉搜索中的目标模板具有更高的分辨率,但它们提供的优势是短暂的。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2021 May;83(4):1435-1454. doi: 10.3758/s13414-020-02213-w. Epub 2021 Jan 6.
9
The depth of distractor processing in search with clutter.在有干扰物的搜索中干扰物加工的深度
Perception. 2007;36(6):821-9. doi: 10.1068/p5748.
10
Region-based shielding of visual search from salient distractors: Target detection is impaired with same- but not different-dimension distractors.基于区域的视觉搜索对显著干扰项的屏蔽:相同维度而非不同维度的干扰项会损害目标检测。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2018 Apr;80(3):622-642. doi: 10.3758/s13414-017-1477-4.

引用本文的文献

1
Mixing novel and familiar cues modifies representations of familiar visual images and affects behavior.混合新颖和熟悉的线索会改变对熟悉视觉图像的表示,并影响行为。
Cell Rep. 2024 Aug 27;43(8):114521. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2024.114521. Epub 2024 Jul 17.
2
Suppressive Control of Incentive Salience in Real-World Human Vision.现实世界人类视觉中的激励显著性的抑制控制。
J Neurosci. 2023 Sep 13;43(37):6415-6429. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0766-23.2023. Epub 2023 Aug 10.
3
Graded prioritisation of targets in search: reward diminishes the low prevalence effect.
目标分级搜索中的优先化:奖励降低了低患病率效应。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2023 Aug 4;8(1):52. doi: 10.1186/s41235-023-00507-9.
4
Letter processing in upright bigrams predicts reading fluency variations in children.正立双字母词加工预测儿童阅读流畅性变化。
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2022 Sep;151(9):2237-2249. doi: 10.1037/xge0001175. Epub 2022 Feb 10.
5
Target familiarity and visual working memory do not influence familiarity effect in visual search.目标熟悉度和视觉工作记忆不会影响视觉搜索中的熟悉效应。
Sci Rep. 2021 Apr 7;11(1):7560. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-86669-2.
6
Working memory is corrupted by strategic changes in search templates.工作记忆因搜索模板的策略性变化而受损。
J Vis. 2020 Aug 3;20(8):3. doi: 10.1167/jov.20.8.3.
7
A compositional neural code in high-level visual cortex can explain jumbled word reading.高级视觉皮层中的组合神经代码可以解释乱序单词阅读。
Elife. 2020 May 5;9:e54846. doi: 10.7554/eLife.54846.
8
Reading Increases the Compositionality of Visual Word Representations.阅读增加视觉词汇表示的组合性。
Psychol Sci. 2019 Dec;30(12):1707-1723. doi: 10.1177/0956797619881134. Epub 2019 Nov 7.
9
The Sonar Model for Humpback Whale Song Revised.座头鲸歌声的声纳模型修订版。
Front Psychol. 2018 Jul 16;9:1156. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01156. eCollection 2018.
10
Monitoring Processes in Visual Search Enhanced by Professional Experience: The Case of Orange Quality-Control Workers.专业经验增强视觉搜索中的监测过程:以橙子质量控制工人为例。
Front Psychol. 2018 Feb 14;9:145. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00145. eCollection 2018.