• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

视觉搜索不对称性取决于目标-干扰项特征相似性:这种不对称性仅仅是干扰项排除速度的结果吗?

Visual search asymmetry depends on target-distractor feature similarity: Is the asymmetry simply a result of distractor rejection speed?

作者信息

Zhang Yichi Raven, Onyper Serge

机构信息

Department of Psychology, St. Lawrence University, Canton, NY, 13617, USA.

University of Maryland, College Park, MD, USA.

出版信息

Atten Percept Psychophys. 2020 Jan;82(1):80-97. doi: 10.3758/s13414-019-01818-0.

DOI:10.3758/s13414-019-01818-0
PMID:31359376
Abstract

Previous studies have shown that in visual search, varying the target and distractor familiarity produces a search asymmetry: Detecting a novel target among familiar distractors is more efficient than detecting a familiar target among novel distractors. One explanation is that novel targets have enhanced salience and are detected preattentively. Conversely, familiar distractors may be easier to reject. The current study postulates that target-distractor feature similarity, in addition to target or distractor familiarity, is a key determinant of visual search efficiency. The results of two experiments reveal that visual search is more efficient when distractors are familiar regardless of target familiarity, but only when the target-distractor similarity is high. When similarity is low, the visual search asymmetry disappears and the search times become highly efficient, with search slopes not different from zero regardless of target or distractor familiarity. However, although distractor familiarity plays an important role in inducing the search asymmetry, comparisons of search efficiency in target-present and target-absent trials reveal that search asymmetries cannot be explained solely by the faster speed of rejecting familiar distractors, as proposed by previous studies. Rather, distractor familiarity influences processes outside of stimulus selection, such as search monitoring and termination decisions. Competition among bottom-up item salience effects and top-down shape recognition processes is proposed to account for these findings.

摘要

先前的研究表明,在视觉搜索中,改变目标和干扰项的熟悉程度会产生搜索不对称性:在熟悉的干扰项中检测新目标比在新的干扰项中检测熟悉目标更有效。一种解释是,新目标具有更高的显著性,并且能够在注意力前被检测到。相反,熟悉的干扰项可能更容易被排除。当前的研究假设,除了目标或干扰项的熟悉程度外,目标-干扰项特征相似性是视觉搜索效率的关键决定因素。两项实验的结果表明,无论目标熟悉程度如何,当干扰项熟悉时,视觉搜索更有效,但前提是目标-干扰项相似性较高。当相似性较低时,视觉搜索不对称性消失,搜索时间变得高效,无论目标或干扰项熟悉程度如何,搜索斜率都与零无差异。然而,尽管干扰项熟悉程度在引发搜索不对称性方面起着重要作用,但对有目标和无目标试验中搜索效率的比较表明,搜索不对称性不能像先前研究所提出的那样,仅仅通过更快地排除熟悉干扰项的速度来解释。相反,干扰项熟悉程度会影响刺激选择之外的过程,如搜索监控和终止决策。研究提出,自下而上的项目显著性效应和自上而下的形状识别过程之间的竞争可以解释这些发现。

相似文献

1
Visual search asymmetry depends on target-distractor feature similarity: Is the asymmetry simply a result of distractor rejection speed?视觉搜索不对称性取决于目标-干扰项特征相似性:这种不对称性仅仅是干扰项排除速度的结果吗?
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2020 Jan;82(1):80-97. doi: 10.3758/s13414-019-01818-0.
2
Target familiarity and visual working memory do not influence familiarity effect in visual search.目标熟悉度和视觉工作记忆不会影响视觉搜索中的熟悉效应。
Sci Rep. 2021 Apr 7;11(1):7560. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-86669-2.
3
Distractor familiarity leads to more efficient visual search for complex stimuli.干扰项熟悉度有助于更高效地对复杂刺激进行视觉搜索。
Percept Psychophys. 2005 Aug;67(6):1016-31. doi: 10.3758/bf03193628.
4
Visual search asymmetry: the influence of stimulus familiarity and low-level features.视觉搜索不对称性:刺激熟悉度和低层次特征的影响
Percept Psychophys. 2001 Apr;63(3):464-75. doi: 10.3758/bf03194413.
5
Efficient visual search for multiple targets among categorical distractors: effects of distractor-distractor similarity across trials.在分类干扰物中对多个目标进行高效视觉搜索:不同试验中干扰物-干扰物相似性的影响
Vision Res. 2014 Mar;96:96-105. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2014.01.009. Epub 2014 Jan 31.
6
Target-distractor similarity predicts visual search efficiency but only for highly similar features.目标-干扰物相似性可预测视觉搜索效率,但仅适用于高度相似的特征。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2024 Aug;86(6):1872-1882. doi: 10.3758/s13414-024-02954-y. Epub 2024 Sep 9.
7
A search order lost effect: ignoring a singleton distractor affects visual search efficiency.搜索顺序失去作用:忽略单一干扰项会影响视觉搜索效率。
Vision Res. 2010 Jun 25;50(14):1402-13. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2009.12.002. Epub 2009 Dec 16.
8
Effect of local fluency gradient of objects creates search asymmetry.物体局部流畅度梯度的影响会产生搜索不对称性。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2019 Jan;81(1):71-84. doi: 10.3758/s13414-018-1576-x.
9
You look familiar, but I don't care: Lure rejection in hybrid visual and memory search is not based on familiarity.你看起来很面熟,但我不在乎:混合视觉与记忆搜索中的诱饵排斥并非基于熟悉度。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2015 Dec;41(6):1576-87. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000096. Epub 2015 Jul 20.
10
Dwelling on distractors varying in target-distractor similarity.专注于目标与干扰项相似度不同的干扰项。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2019 Jul;198:102859. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2019.05.011. Epub 2019 Jun 15.

引用本文的文献

1
Target familiarity and visual working memory do not influence familiarity effect in visual search.目标熟悉度和视觉工作记忆不会影响视觉搜索中的熟悉效应。
Sci Rep. 2021 Apr 7;11(1):7560. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-86669-2.
2
Is apparent instability a guiding feature in visual search?明显的不稳定性是视觉搜索中的一个指导性特征吗?
Vis cogn. 2020;28(3):218-238. doi: 10.1080/13506285.2020.1779892. Epub 2020 Jun 16.
3
Working memory is corrupted by strategic changes in search templates.工作记忆因搜索模板的策略性变化而受损。
J Vis. 2020 Aug 3;20(8):3. doi: 10.1167/jov.20.8.3.