Suppr超能文献

注意力会导致虚幻的线条移动吗?

Does attention cause illusory line motion?

作者信息

Christie John, Klein Raymond M

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H 4J1, Canada.

出版信息

Percept Psychophys. 2005 Aug;67(6):1032-43. doi: 10.3758/bf03193629.

Abstract

Illusory line motion (ILM) has been shown to occur when a line is presented with one end next to a previously stimulated location. The line appears to be drawn away from the site of stimulation. It has been suggested that this is because of the allocation of attention to the stimulated site. Using an endogenous attentional manipulation (a central arrow cue) with no differences in the display between the two ends of the line at the time of line presentation or immediately prior, no ILM was detected, though there was a small effect in the opposite direction. Those who have found endogenously induced ILM have used an endogenous cue based on a property of a location marker that indicated the cued location. Changing the method of cuing to one based on a property of a peripheral marker instead of a central arrow produced a small but significant report of ILM. The small magnitude of the effect, participant self-reports, and the absence of the effect in the purely endogenous condition, suggest that this was merely a bias. ILM is not generated by endogenous attention shifts.

摘要

当一条线的一端靠近先前受到刺激的位置呈现时,会出现虚幻线条运动(ILM)。这条线似乎被从刺激部位拉开。有人认为这是由于注意力分配到了受刺激部位。使用内源性注意力操纵(一个中央箭头提示),在线条呈现时或紧接之前,线条两端的显示没有差异,未检测到ILM,尽管有一个小的相反方向的效应。那些发现内源性诱导ILM的人使用了基于位置标记属性的内源性提示,该标记指示了被提示的位置。将提示方法改为基于外围标记而不是中央箭头的属性,产生了一个小但显著的ILM报告。效应的小幅度、参与者的自我报告以及在纯内源性条件下效应的缺失,表明这仅仅是一种偏差。ILM不是由内源性注意力转移产生的。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验