Christie John
a Psychology and Neuroscience , Dalhousie University , Halifax , NS , Canada.
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2014;67(12):2293-300. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2014.918633. Epub 2014 May 20.
Christie and Klein [2005. Does attention cause illusory line motion? Perception & Psychophysics, 67(6), 1032-1043] published line motion ratings consistent with illusory line motion (ILM) after peripheral endogenous cues but not central arrow cues. When attention was directed endogenously on the basis of the shape of one of two peripherally presented objects, participants reported small, but significant motion away from the attended object, and this was attributed to participant bias, or to a peripherally directed object-based attention system endogenously recruited to differentiate the peripheral shapes. By using a unique cueing method with identical peripheral markers, but still allowing them to act as cues, the findings of Christie and Klein Experiment 4 were replicated. This reduces the likelihood that object discrimination or object attention mechanisms are responsible for the reported ILM-like effects.
克里斯蒂和克莱因[2005年。注意力会导致虚幻的线条移动吗？《知觉与心理物理学》，67(6)，1032 - 1043]发表了与外周内源性线索引发的虚幻线条移动（ILM）相符的线条移动评分，但中央箭头线索引发的情况并非如此。当基于两个外周呈现物体之一的形状内源性地引导注意力时，参与者报告了小幅度但显著的远离被关注物体的移动，这被归因于参与者偏差，或者归因于内源性招募的基于外周指向物体的注意力系统，用于区分外周形状。通过使用一种独特的提示方法，该方法具有相同的外周标记，但仍允许它们作为线索，重复了克里斯蒂和克莱因实验4的结果。这降低了物体辨别或物体注意力机制导致所报告的类似ILM效应的可能性。
