Suppr超能文献

健康计划中偏头痛及可能偏头痛的医学诊断与治疗模式

Patterns of medical diagnosis and treatment of migraine and probable migraine in a health plan.

作者信息

Bigal M E, Kolodner K B, Lafata J E, Leotta C, Lipton R B

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, New York, NY, USA.

出版信息

Cephalalgia. 2006 Jan;26(1):43-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2982.2005.00988.x.

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to assess the proportion of subjects with strict migraine (SM, migraine with and without aura), probable migraine (PM), and all migraine (AM, SM and PM pooled together), who receive a medical diagnosis or a specific treatment within a health plan. Eligible participants were 18-55-year participants of a non-profit health maintenance organization (HMO) who had received out-patient, emergency department, or in-patient care from a physician within the past year. We used a validated computer-assisted telephone interview (CATI) survey to identify SM, PM and controls (received out-patient, emergency department, or in-patient care from a physician for any reason within the past year, but did not have SM or PM). Medical and prescription drug claims for the 24-month period were linked to participant files. Among 8579 respondents, we identified 1265 SM sufferers and 1252 PM sufferers, which were compared with 960 randomly selected controls. Just 194 (15.3%) SM, 21 (1.7%) PM, and 215 (8.5%) AM sufferers received an in-patient or out-patient primary migraine claim in the previous 24 months, compared with six (0.5%) controls; 240 (18.9%) SM, 39 (3.1%) PM, 279 (11.1%) AM sufferers, and eight controls (0.6%) received any migraine claim. There were claims for migraine drugs (ICD-9 code for triptans or ergot compounds) for just 140 (11.1%) SM and 34 (2.7%) PM sufferers, and migraine analgesics (butalbital and isomethepthene compounds), for 6.3% SM and 2.2% PM sufferers (0.7% of the controls). Migraine preventives were used for a larger number of SM and PM sufferers (19.6% and 13.1%), but also for controls (10.5%), indicating that they were probably used for other medical reasons. Both SM and PM are underdiagnosed and undertreated within a health plan. Educational strategies should focus on physician education addressing diagnosing the full spectrum of migraine and physician management of migraine with specific migraine therapy in appropriate patients.

摘要

本研究的目的是评估在一个健康计划中接受医学诊断或特定治疗的严格偏头痛(SM,伴或不伴先兆的偏头痛)、可能偏头痛(PM)以及所有偏头痛(AM,SM和PM合并)患者的比例。符合条件的参与者是一个非营利性健康维护组织(HMO)中年龄在18至55岁之间的成员,他们在过去一年中曾接受过医生的门诊、急诊科或住院治疗。我们使用经过验证的计算机辅助电话访谈(CATI)调查来识别SM、PM患者以及对照组(在过去一年中因任何原因接受过医生的门诊、急诊科或住院治疗,但没有SM或PM)。将24个月期间的医疗和处方药索赔与参与者档案相关联。在8579名受访者中,我们识别出1265名SM患者和1252名PM患者,并将他们与960名随机选择的对照组进行比较。在之前的24个月中,只有194名(15.3%)SM患者、21名(1.7%)PM患者和215名(8.5%)AM患者有住院或门诊原发性偏头痛索赔,而对照组为6名(0.5%);240名(18.9%)SM患者、39名(3.1%)PM患者、279名(11.1%)AM患者和8名对照组(0.6%)有任何偏头痛索赔。只有140名(11.1%)SM患者和34名(2.7%)PM患者有偏头痛药物(曲坦类或麦角化合物的ICD - 9代码)索赔,6.3%的SM患者和2.2%的PM患者有偏头痛镇痛药(布他比妥和异美汀化合物)索赔(对照组为0.7%)。更多的SM和PM患者使用了偏头痛预防药物(分别为19.6%和13.1%),但对照组也有10.5%使用,这表明这些药物可能因其他医疗原因而使用。在健康计划中,SM和PM患者均未得到充分诊断和治疗。教育策略应侧重于对医生进行教育,使其能够全面诊断偏头痛,并对合适的患者采用特定的偏头痛治疗方法进行医生管理。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验