• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

药物治疗决策中药效流行病学面临的挑战与机遇

Challenges and opportunities for pharmacoepidemiology in drug-therapy decision making.

作者信息

Etminan Mahyar, Gill Sudeep, Fitzgerald Mark, Samii Ali

机构信息

Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Evaluation, Vancouver Hosptial, 7th Floor, 828 West 10th Avenue, Vancouver, B.C., Canada.

出版信息

J Clin Pharmacol. 2006 Jan;46(1):6-9. doi: 10.1177/0091270005283285.

DOI:10.1177/0091270005283285
PMID:16397278
Abstract

Pharmacoepidemiology is a relatively new and evolving science that attempts to quantify mainly adverse drug events and patterns of drug use in a large population. The strength of pharmacoepidemiology over randomized trials is the ability to quantify rare adverse events that may occur over long periods. Recently, discordance in the results of pharmacoepidemiologic studies has made it difficult for clinicians and policy makers to make informed drug-therapy decisions. This commentary addresses the strength of pharmacoepidemiology and the advances in the methodology of pharmacoepidemiologic studies over the years. We also discuss the potential problem of discordant results and urge pharmacoepidemiologists to develop good practice guidelines for the conduct of pharmacoepidemiologic studies.

摘要

药物流行病学是一门相对较新且不断发展的科学,它主要试图在大量人群中量化药物不良事件和药物使用模式。药物流行病学相对于随机试验的优势在于能够量化可能在长期内发生的罕见不良事件。最近,药物流行病学研究结果的不一致使得临床医生和政策制定者难以做出明智的药物治疗决策。本评论阐述了药物流行病学的优势以及多年来药物流行病学研究方法的进展。我们还讨论了结果不一致的潜在问题,并敦促药物流行病学家制定药物流行病学研究实施的良好实践指南。

相似文献

1
Challenges and opportunities for pharmacoepidemiology in drug-therapy decision making.药物治疗决策中药效流行病学面临的挑战与机遇
J Clin Pharmacol. 2006 Jan;46(1):6-9. doi: 10.1177/0091270005283285.
2
Observational studies and the withdrawal of rofecoxib.观察性研究与罗非昔布的撤市
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2006 Mar;15(3):199-201; author reply 203-5. doi: 10.1002/pds.1219.
3
Bringing the FDA's Information to Market.将美国食品药品监督管理局的信息推向市场。
Arch Intern Med. 2009 Nov 23;169(21):1985-7. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.399.
4
A retrospective analysis of VIOXX in Australia: using clinical trial data and linked administrative health data to predict patient groups at risk of an adverse drug event.澳大利亚对万络的回顾性分析:利用临床试验数据和关联的行政健康数据预测有药物不良事件风险的患者群体。
Aust N Z J Public Health. 2010 Aug;34(4):431-2. doi: 10.1111/j.1753-6405.2009.00579.x.
5
Drug safety: are we making progress?: comment on "pooled analysis of rofecoxib placebo-controlled clinical trial data".药物安全性:我们正在取得进展吗?:对“罗非昔布安慰剂对照临床试验数据的汇总分析”的评论
Arch Intern Med. 2010 Jan 25;170(2):202. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2009.496.
6
Optimal matching ratios in drug safety surveillance.药物安全监测中的最佳匹配率
Epidemiology. 2014 Sep;25(5):772-3. doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000148.
7
An application of propensity score matching using claims data.一项使用理赔数据进行倾向得分匹配的应用。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2005 Jul;14(7):465-76. doi: 10.1002/pds.1062.
8
[How many harmed by rofecoxib in Germany?].[在德国有多少人因罗非昔布而受到伤害?]
Med Klin (Munich). 2006 Aug 15;101(8):675-6; author reply 678-9.
9
Use of the self-controlled case-series method in vaccine safety studies: review and recommendations for best practice.应用自身对照病例系列研究方法于疫苗安全性研究:最佳实践的回顾与建议。
Epidemiol Infect. 2011 Dec;139(12):1805-17. doi: 10.1017/S0950268811001531. Epub 2011 Aug 18.
10
A guide for assessing pharmacoepidemiologic studies.药物流行病学研究评估指南
Pharmacotherapy. 1992;12(3):232-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Pharmacoepidemiology: An Overview.药物流行病学:概述
J Clin Med. 2023 Nov 10;12(22):7033. doi: 10.3390/jcm12227033.
2
Health outcomes and policy in pharmay curricula among Arab countries: An evaluation of 191 academic institutions.阿拉伯国家药学课程中的健康结果与政策:对191所学术机构的评估
Saudi Pharm J. 2021 Aug;29(8):799-806. doi: 10.1016/j.jsps.2021.06.001. Epub 2021 Jun 12.
3
Bias in pharmacoepidemiologic studies using secondary health care databases: a scoping review.利用二级医疗保健数据库进行药物流行病学研究中的偏倚:范围综述。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2019 Mar 11;19(1):53. doi: 10.1186/s12874-019-0695-y.
4
Rare, serious, and comprehensively described suspected adverse drug reactions reported by surveyed healthcare professionals in Uganda.乌干达接受调查的医疗保健专业人员报告的罕见、严重且有全面描述的疑似药物不良反应。
PLoS One. 2015 Apr 23;10(4):e0123974. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123974. eCollection 2015.
5
Relevance of pharmacoepidemiology to Nepal.药物流行病学对尼泊尔的相关性。
Australas Med J. 2013 Aug 31;6(9):445-9. doi: 10.4066/AMJ.2013.1755. eCollection 2013.
6
Prescription of psychiatric medications and polypharmacy in the LAMS cohort.精神科药物处方和 LAMS 队列中的多种药物治疗。
Psychiatr Serv. 2013 Oct;64(10):1026-34. doi: 10.1176/appi.ps.201200507.
7
Pharmacoepidemiology education in US colleges and schools of pharmacy.美国药学院校的药物流行病学教育
Am J Pharm Educ. 2007 Aug 15;71(4):80. doi: 10.5688/aj710480.