Lee Jean W, Devanarayan Viswanath, Barrett Yu Chen, Weiner Russell, Allinson John, Fountain Scott, Keller Stephen, Weinryb Ira, Green Marie, Duan Larry, Rogers James A, Millham Robert, O'Brien Peter J, Sailstad Jeff, Khan Masood, Ray Chad, Wagner John A
Formerly MDS Pharma Services, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA.
Pharm Res. 2006 Feb;23(2):312-28. doi: 10.1007/s11095-005-9045-3. Epub 2006 Jan 12.
Despite major advances in modern drug discovery and development, the number of new drug approvals has not kept pace with the increased cost of their development. Increasingly, innovative uses of biomarkers are employed in an attempt to speed new drugs to market. Still, widespread adoption of biomarkers is impeded by limited experience interpreting biomarker data and an unclear regulatory climate. Key differences preclude the direct application of existing validation paradigms for drug analysis to biomarker research. Following the AAPS 2003 Biomarker Workshop (J. W. Lee, R. S. Weiner, J. M. Sailstad, et al. Method validation and measurement of biomarkers in nonclinical and clinical samples in drug development. A conference report. Pharm Res 22:499-511, 2005), these and other critical issues were addressed. A practical, iterative, "fit-for-purpose" approach to biomarker method development and validation is proposed, keeping in mind the intended use of the data and the attendant regulatory requirements associated with that use. Sample analysis within this context of fit-for-purpose method development and validation are well suited for successful biomarker implementation, allowing increased use of biomarkers in drug development.
尽管现代药物发现与开发取得了重大进展,但新药获批数量却未能跟上其开发成本的增长速度。人们越来越多地采用生物标志物的创新用途,试图加速新药上市。然而,生物标志物的广泛应用仍受到生物标志物数据解读经验有限以及监管环境不明朗的阻碍。关键差异使得药物分析的现有验证范式无法直接应用于生物标志物研究。在2003年美国药学科学家协会生物标志物研讨会(J. W. 李、R. S. 韦纳、J. M. 赛尔施塔德等人,《药物开发中非临床和临床样本中生物标志物的方法验证与测量:会议报告》,《药物研究》22:499 - 511,2005年)之后,这些以及其他关键问题得到了探讨。本文提出了一种实用的、迭代的、“适用即目的”的生物标志物方法开发与验证方法,同时牢记数据的预期用途以及与该用途相关的监管要求。在这种适用即目的方法开发与验证的背景下进行样本分析,非常适合成功实施生物标志物,从而能够在药物开发中更多地使用生物标志物。