Lindena Gabriele, Nauck Friedemann, Bausewein Claudia, Neuwöhner Karl, Heine Oliver, Schulenberg Dieter, Radbruch Lukas
Clinical Analysis, Research and Application, CLARA Kleinmachnow.
Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich. 2005;99(9):555-65.
Quality assurance has been started in palliative care units since 1999, using a documentation project based on yearly documentation periods. The project was developed by a working party of palliative care specialists in cooperation with the German Cancer Society and the German Association for Palliative Medicine. The aim was a concise but meaningful standard documentation, able to describe the special therapeutic situation of palliative care patients and the interdisciplinary and multi-professional care they receive. In this paper, data of 4693 in-patient treatment periods relating to structural, procedural and outcome quality of palliative care units are presented from the beginning of the core documentation in 1999 through 2001. In 2002, data from palliative care units were compared with those from oncologic and geriatric wards, as well as hospices. Palliative care units show constant traits since the beginning of the core documentation in 1999, in spite of the rising number of participants. At the same time, there are distinct differences among the groups of participants due to the scope of their therapeutic setting. These relate to structure quality in the functional status of the patients (ECOG), which is worst in hospices (> palliative care units > geriatric wards > oncologic wards); to process quality in intensified pain treatment concerning incidence and intensity of pain, which is most frequent and severe in palliative care units (> hospices > geriatric > oncologic wards); and outcome quality in the rate of discharge home, which is highest in oncologic wards (> geriatric > palliative care units > hospices). Quality assurance in palliative care is difficult due to complex indicators, which should be assessed in a standardised documentation. The core documentation was established as a quality assurance programme for palliative care patients. The results of the previous evaluations have enabled the development of a standard documentation. The continuous application of such a standard documentation will prove the quality improvement and development of the participating units.
自1999年起,姑息治疗病房便开始实施质量保证措施,采用基于年度记录周期的文档项目。该项目由姑息治疗专家工作小组与德国癌症协会和德国姑息医学协会合作开发。其目的是制定一份简洁但有意义的标准文档,能够描述姑息治疗患者的特殊治疗情况以及他们所接受的跨学科和多专业护理。本文呈现了从1999年核心文档开始至2001年期间,4693个住院治疗周期中有关姑息治疗病房结构、流程和结果质量的数据。2002年,将姑息治疗病房的数据与肿瘤病房、老年病房以及临终关怀机构的数据进行了比较。自1999年核心文档开始以来,尽管参与人数不断增加,但姑息治疗病房呈现出一些稳定的特征。与此同时,由于治疗环境的范围不同,各参与组之间存在明显差异。这些差异涉及患者功能状态(东部肿瘤协作组,ECOG)的结构质量,在临终关怀机构中最差(>姑息治疗病房>老年病房>肿瘤病房);涉及强化疼痛治疗的过程质量,包括疼痛的发生率和强度,在姑息治疗病房中最为频繁和严重(>临终关怀机构>老年病房>肿瘤病房);以及出院回家率的结果质量,在肿瘤病房中最高(>老年病房>姑息治疗病房>临终关怀机构)。由于指标复杂,姑息治疗的质量保证存在困难,这些指标应在标准化文档中进行评估。核心文档被确立为姑息治疗患者的质量保证计划。先前评估的结果促成了标准文档的制定。持续应用这样的标准文档将证明参与单位的质量改进和发展。