Forjuoh Samuel N, Reis Michael D, Couchman Glen R, Symm Barbalee, Mason Saundra, O'Banon Ricky
Department of Family and Community Medicine, Scott and White Memorial Hospital, Temple, Texas 76504, USA.
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005 Dec;53(12):2173-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2005.00497.x.
To assess physicians' responses to written feedback on medication discrepancies found with their elderly ambulatory patients.
Cross-sectional survey.
Four clinics of a large university-affiliated, multispecialty group practice associated with a 186,000-member health maintenance organization.
Patients aged 65 and older (n=202) and their family physicians (n=32).
Medication discrepancies and physicians' responses to written feedback on letters and adhesive labels containing a list of patients' actual medications.
A medication discrepancy was identified with 171 of 202 patients (84.7%). They resulted from patients not taking charted medications (52.9%), patients taking medications that were not charted (34.3%), or difference in dosage and/or schedule (12.8%). The medications involved were mostly complementary/alternative (28.3%), respiratory/allergy (15.1%), and analgesics (14.1%). The majority of physicians reported that the letters (93.8%) and accompanying labels (90.6%) were helpful to them. Half of the physicians reported filing the letters in patients' charts, whereas the other half discarded them. The majority (93.8%) also perceived the labels as an additional benefit to their practice and placed them in patients' charts to be used to correct patients' medications. Receptivity to the feedback was unrelated to physician age group, sex, years in practice, or clinic of practice.
Although medication discrepancies are common in elderly ambulatory patients, their family physicians appreciate assistance in correcting these discrepancies, although potential problems, such as cultural or organizational resistance to the open disclosure of medication discrepancies in medical records due to associated legal ramifications, may need to be resolved.
评估医生对关于其老年门诊患者用药差异的书面反馈的反应。
横断面调查。
一所大型大学附属医院多专科集团诊所的四家诊所,该诊所与一个拥有18.6万名会员的健康维护组织相关联。
65岁及以上患者(n = 202)及其家庭医生(n = 32)。
用药差异以及医生对包含患者实际用药清单的信件和不干胶标签上书面反馈的反应。
202名患者中有171名(84.7%)被发现存在用药差异。这些差异是由于患者未服用记录在案的药物(52.9%)、患者服用了未记录在案的药物(34.3%)或剂量和/或用药时间表不同(12.8%)导致的。涉及的药物大多为补充/替代药物(28.3%)、呼吸/过敏药物(15.1%)和镇痛药(14.1%)。大多数医生报告称信件(93.8%)和随附标签(90.6%)对他们有帮助。一半的医生报告将信件归档到患者病历中,而另一半则丢弃了信件。大多数医生(93.8%)也认为标签对他们的工作有额外帮助,并将其放入患者病历中以用于纠正患者的用药。对反馈的接受程度与医生的年龄组、性别、从业年限或执业诊所无关。
尽管用药差异在老年门诊患者中很常见,但他们的家庭医生很感激在纠正这些差异方面得到的帮助,不过可能需要解决一些潜在问题,比如由于相关法律后果,文化或组织层面对于在医疗记录中公开用药差异存在抵触。