Suppr超能文献

老年门诊患者报告的药物使用差异:与不良事件和药物相互作用的相关性。

Discrepancies in reported drug use in geriatric outpatients: relevance to adverse events and drug-drug interactions.

作者信息

Tulner Linda R, Kuper Ingeborg M J A, Frankfort Suzanne V, van Campen Jos P C M, Koks Cornelis H W, Brandjes Desiderius P M, Beijnen Jos H

机构信息

Department of Geriatric Medicine, Slotervaart Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Am J Geriatr Pharmacother. 2009 Apr;7(2):93-104. doi: 10.1016/j.amjopharm.2009.04.006.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Increased age is associated with polypharmacy. Polypharmacy is a risk factor for severe adverse drug reactions (ADRs) and is associated with an increased risk of mortality.

OBJECTIVES

The main goal of the current study was to describe the frequency and relevancy of discrepancies in drug use in Dutch geriatric outpatients as reported by the patients and their caregivers, documented by the referring general practitioner (GP), and registered by the public pharmacy. The frequency of medication discrepancy adverse patient events (MDAPEs) was also recorded. In addition, possible contributing factors-such as increasing age, cognitive status and depressive symptoms, the number of medications used, the number of physicians visited by the patient, and the presence of a caregiver to supervise medication use-were studied.

METHODS

This was a prospective descriptive study conducted at the geriatric outpatient clinic of a teaching hospital. Between January 1 and May 1, 2005, consecutive patients were included if they were aged >65 years, reported use of > or =1 medication, and if they could understand the goals and consequences of participating in the study. The medications described by geriatric patients and their caregivers were compared with the drugs listed by their GP. The pharmacies of the referred patients were asked to send a description of the drugs distributed in the 6 months preceding the patient's visit to the geriatric outpatient clinic. The classification of ADRs and undertreatment as clinically relevant was done by study investigators who were blinded for the presence of discrepancy.

RESULTS

A total of 120 outpatients were included. The mean (SD) age of the study patients was 82.3 (6.8) years; 71.7% were women. Of the 120 patients, 113 patients (94.2%) reported taking >1 drug and 88 (73.3%) were prescribed > or =4 drugs. At least 1 discrepancy between the medication lists of the patients, GP, or pharmacy was present in 104 of the 120 patients (86.7%). In 90 patients (75.0%), there was > or =1 discrepancy between the medication reported by the patient and the GP. Patients with > or =1 discrepancy reported taking a higher mean number of drugs and had more prescribing physicians in addition to their GP. Twenty-nine patients (24.2%) experienced an MDAPE involving the use of drugs the GP had not correctly described in the letter of referral. The pharmacy was unaware of the use of medication involved in an MDAPE in 2 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Geriatricians should assume that the medication lists supplied by GPs are incomplete or incorrect, and be aware that in approximately 25% of patients, symptoms may be caused by medication use inaccurately described in the referral. Reports by the community pharmacy may supply valuable additional information. Because there are also discrepancies between patients and pharmacies, medication use from a database-with data from prescribing physicians and pharmacy systems-will still have to be confirmed by the patient.

摘要

背景

年龄增长与多重用药相关。多重用药是严重药物不良反应(ADR)的一个危险因素,且与死亡率增加有关。

目的

本研究的主要目标是描述荷兰老年门诊患者所报告的、由转诊全科医生(GP)记录并由公共药房登记的用药差异的频率和相关性。还记录了用药差异不良患者事件(MDAPE)的频率。此外,研究了可能的影响因素,如年龄增长、认知状态和抑郁症状、所用药物数量、患者就诊的医生数量以及是否有护理人员监督用药。

方法

这是一项在一家教学医院的老年门诊进行的前瞻性描述性研究。在2005年1月1日至5月1日期间,连续纳入年龄>65岁、报告使用≥1种药物且能理解参与研究的目的和后果的患者。将老年患者及其护理人员描述的药物与他们的全科医生列出的药物进行比较。要求转诊患者的药房提供患者就诊老年门诊前6个月内所分发药物的描述。研究调查人员在不知差异存在的情况下对ADR和治疗不足进行临床相关性分类。

结果

共纳入120名门诊患者。研究患者的平均(标准差)年龄为82.3(6.8)岁;71.7%为女性。在120名患者中,113名患者(94.2%)报告服用>1种药物,88名患者(73.3%)被处方≥4种药物。120名患者中有104名(86.7%)在患者、全科医生或药房的用药清单之间至少存在1处差异。在90名患者(75.0%)中,患者报告的药物与全科医生的药物之间存在≥1处差异。有≥1处差异的患者报告服用的药物平均数量更多,除全科医生外还有更多的开处方医生。29名患者(24.2%)经历了MDAPE,涉及使用全科医生在转诊信中未正确描述的药物。有2名患者的社区药房未意识到MDAPE中涉及的药物使用情况。

结论

老年病医生应假定全科医生提供的用药清单不完整或不正确,并意识到在大约25%的患者中,症状可能是由转诊中对药物使用的不准确描述引起的。社区药房的报告可能会提供有价值的额外信息。由于患者与药房之间也存在差异,来自数据库(包含开处方医生和药房系统的数据)的用药信息仍需患者确认。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验