Edelstein S F
Miami Children's Hospital, FL 33155.
J Am Diet Assoc. 1992 Aug;92(8):938-41.
The purpose of this study was to compare the development of moral judgment in 171 dietetics students before and after training from internships (n = 96), coordinated undergraduate programs (n = 61), and preprofessional practice programs (n = 14). The results of the study supported the research hypothesis that greater moral development growth would occur in supervised practices that allow students more experiences promoting moral growth, such as clinical rotations with patients, peer discussions on ethical issues, and access to instructors trained in ethics. Analysis of covariance indicated differences in the posttest scores of the three groups. Student scores for the internship and the coordinated undergraduate program were significantly different. Scores of preprofessional practice program students did not differ from those of the other groups. Internship programs offered more time in clinical rotations, used trained ethicists more, and used more methods to introduce ethics into the curriculum than did the other programs.
本研究的目的是比较171名营养学专业学生在实习(n = 96)、本科协调课程(n = 61)和专业预科实践课程(n = 14)培训前后道德判断的发展情况。研究结果支持了研究假设,即在允许学生有更多促进道德成长经历的监督实践中,如与患者的临床轮转、关于伦理问题的同伴讨论以及接触接受过伦理学培训的教师,会出现更大的道德发展增长。协方差分析表明三组后测分数存在差异。实习组和本科协调课程组的学生分数有显著差异。专业预科实践课程组学生的分数与其他组没有差异。与其他课程相比,实习课程在临床轮转上提供了更多时间,更多地使用了受过培训的伦理学家,并且使用了更多方法将伦理学引入课程。