Suppr超能文献

在营养学教育中教授多技能。

Teaching multiskilling in dietetics education.

作者信息

Gates G, Sandoval W

机构信息

Department of Nutritional Sciences, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater 74078-6141, USA.

出版信息

J Am Diet Assoc. 1998 Mar;98(3):278-84. doi: 10.1016/S0002-8223(98)00066-2.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate multiskilling in dietetics education programs, perceived benefits and barriers to multiskilling, and current and anticipated areas of cross training in the dietetics curriculum.

SUBJECTS AND DESIGN

A descriptive survey was conducted using a researcher-developed questionnaire. The questionnaire was pilot tested and mailed in April 1996 to the directors of all 565 accredited and approved dietetics education programs in the United States. Reminder postcards were mailed in May 1996. Responses were received from 276 program directors (48.8%).

STATISTICAL ANALYSIS PERFORMED

Chi(2) analysis and analysis of variance were performed to compare responses by program type. t Tests and correlations compared responses by program size.

RESULTS

Faculty and students from programs with supervised experiences were more likely to be involved with cross training and multidisciplinary teams than were faculty and students from didactic programs. Dietetic technician programs identified the smallest number of benefits and coordinated programs reported the most barriers to cross training. Programs with fewer graduates were more involved with multiskilling. Programs currently included a mean (+/-standard deviation) of 9.1+/-6.3 out of 47 possible cross-training areas in their curricula.

APPLICATIONS

A number of dietetics education programs provide opportunities for students to become multiskilled or cross trained, usually during supervised practice. The challenge for educators is to continue to find innovative ways to train and prepare students for future roles and responsibilities. Dietetics practitioners, especially those who are preceptors or mentors for students, also need to consider how they will meet the demands of future practice.

摘要

目的

调查营养学教育项目中的多技能培养情况、多技能培养所感知到的益处和障碍,以及营养学课程中当前和预期的交叉培训领域。

对象与设计

采用研究人员自行编制的问卷进行描述性调查。该问卷经过预测试,并于1996年4月邮寄给美国所有565个经认可和批准的营养学教育项目的主任。1996年5月邮寄了催复明信片。收到了276位项目主任的回复(回复率为48.8%)。

所进行的统计分析

采用卡方分析和方差分析来比较不同项目类型的回复。t检验和相关性分析用于比较不同项目规模的回复。

结果

与理论教学项目的教师和学生相比,有督导实习经历项目的教师和学生更有可能参与交叉培训和多学科团队。营养学技师项目所指出的益处最少,而协调项目报告的交叉培训障碍最多。毕业生较少的项目更多地参与多技能培养。目前各项目在其课程中平均(±标准差)涵盖了47个可能的交叉培训领域中的9.1±6.3个。

应用

许多营养学教育项目为学生提供成为多技能或接受交叉培训的机会,通常是在督导实习期间。教育工作者面临的挑战是继续寻找创新方法来培训和培养学生以适应未来的角色和职责。营养学从业者,尤其是那些担任学生带教老师或导师的人,也需要考虑如何满足未来实践的需求。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验