O'Connor Richard D, Rosenzweig Jacqueline R Carranza, Stanford Richard H, Gilmore Amanda S, Ryskina Kira L, Legorreta Antonio P, Stempel David A
Sharp Rees Stealy Medical Group, San Diego, California, USA.
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2005 Dec;95(6):535-40. doi: 10.1016/S1081-1206(10)61015-0.
Asthma control is the goal of therapeutic interventions. In observational studies, the use of short-acting beta-agonists (SABAs) is a surrogate for symptoms and emergency department or hospital events for exacerbations.
To compare asthma exacerbations, medication switch, and use of SABAs among 3 treatment cohorts: fluticasone propionate and salmeterol as a single inhaler (FSC), fluticasone and salmeterol as separate inhalers (FP + SAL), and fluticasone propionate alone (FP).
Administrative claims data from approximately 10 million individuals from April 2000 to December 2002 were examined. Patients 15 years or older with claims for asthma, SABAs, and study medications were included in the study. Asthma-related medical and pharmacy claims were evaluated. Multivariate regression techniques were used to model the outcomes of interest, controlling for patient characteristics.
The odds of a hospitalization or emergency department event were significantly lower for the patients receiving FSC (n=1013) compared with those receiving FP (n=1130) (odds ratio, 0.75; 95% confidence interval, 0.61-0.93) and those receiving FP + SAL (n=271) (odds ratio, 0.69; 95% confidence interval, 0.51-0.95). Patients receiving FSC also had a significantly lower risk of switch or discontinuation of index medication and lower rates of postindex SABA use.
In this analysis, patients receiving FSC had lower rates of asthma-related symptoms and exacerbations as measured by SABA refills and hospitalization, respectively, when compared with patients receiving either FP or FP + SAL. This observational examination of medical and pharmacy claims data adds to the clinical reports that demonstrate the increased effectiveness of FSC when compared with FP or FP + SAL.
哮喘控制是治疗干预的目标。在观察性研究中,使用短效β受体激动剂(SABA)是症状以及急诊或因病情加重而住院情况的替代指标。
比较3个治疗队列中哮喘加重、药物转换以及SABA的使用情况,这3个队列分别为:丙酸氟替卡松和沙美特罗单一吸入器(FSC)、氟替卡松和沙美特罗分开吸入器(FP + SAL)以及单独使用丙酸氟替卡松(FP)。
检查了2000年4月至2002年12月期间约1000万个体的行政索赔数据。纳入研究的患者年龄在15岁及以上,有哮喘、SABA及研究药物的索赔记录。对与哮喘相关的医疗和药房索赔进行了评估。使用多变量回归技术对感兴趣的结果进行建模,并对患者特征进行控制。
与接受FP(n = 1130)的患者相比,接受FSC(n = 1013)的患者住院或急诊事件的几率显著降低(比值比,0.75;95%置信区间,0.61 - 0.93),与接受FP + SAL(n = 271)的患者相比也显著降低(比值比,0.69;95%置信区间,0.51 - 0.95)。接受FSC的患者转换或停用索引药物的风险也显著较低,索引药物后SABA的使用率也较低。
在此分析中,与接受FP或FP + SAL的患者相比,接受FSC的患者分别通过SABA补充剂和住院衡量的哮喘相关症状和加重发生率较低。对医疗和药房索赔数据的这种观察性检查补充了临床报告,这些报告表明与FP或FP + SAL相比,FSC的有效性更高。