Frankel Jason E, Marwitz Jennifer H, Cifu David X, Kreutzer Jeffrey S, Englander Jeffrey, Rosenthal Mitchell
Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Virginia Commonwealth University, Medical College of Virginia Campus, Richmond, VA 23298-0677, USA.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006 Jan;87(1):57-62. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2005.07.309.
To examine age-related differences in rehabilitation outcomes following traumatic brain injury (TBI).
Retrospective collaborative study.
Patients received acute neurotrauma and inpatient rehabilitation services at 1 of the 17 National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research-designated Traumatic Brain Injury Model Systems (TBIMS) centers.
A sample of 273 older patients (> or =55y) admitted for TBI were taken from the TBIMS National Database. Older patients were matched with subjects 44 years of age or younger, based on severity of injury (Glasgow Coma Scale score, length of coma, intracranial pressure elevations). Due to decreasing length of stay (LOS), only patients admitted from 1996 through 2002 were included.
Inpatient interdisciplinary brain injury rehabilitation.
Acute care LOS, inpatient rehabilitation LOS, admission and discharge FIM instrument and Disability Rating Scale (DRS) scores, FIM and DRS efficiency, acute and rehabilitative charges, and discharge disposition.
One-way analyses of variance demonstrated a statistically significant difference between older and younger patients with respect to LOS in rehabilitation but not for acute care. Total rehabilitative charges, and admission and discharge DRS and FIM scores also showed statistically significant differences between groups. Older patients progressed with significantly less efficiency on both the DRS and FIM scales. Significantly more charges were generated per unit for older patients to improve on the DRS scale, but not the FIM scale. Using chi-square analysis, a statistically significant difference in rate of discharge to home was identified between older (80.5%) and younger (94.4%) patients.
Results in this study are similar to those in earlier studies with smaller sample sizes. Major differences observed include significantly slower and more costly progress in inpatient rehabilitation for older patients with TBI, as well as a significantly lower rate of discharge to community for older patients. However, even with decreasing LOS in both settings, community discharge rate is still encouraging for older patients with TBI.
探讨创伤性脑损伤(TBI)后康复结局的年龄差异。
回顾性协作研究。
患者在17个国家残疾与康复研究所指定的创伤性脑损伤模型系统(TBIMS)中心之一接受急性神经创伤和住院康复服务。
从TBIMS国家数据库中抽取273名因TBI入院的老年患者(≥55岁)。根据损伤严重程度(格拉斯哥昏迷量表评分、昏迷时间、颅内压升高情况),将老年患者与44岁及以下的受试者进行匹配。由于住院时间(LOS)缩短,仅纳入1996年至2002年入院的患者。
住院多学科脑损伤康复。
急性护理住院时间、住院康复住院时间、入院和出院时的FIM工具及残疾评定量表(DRS)评分、FIM和DRS效率、急性和康复费用以及出院处置情况。
单因素方差分析显示,老年患者与年轻患者在康复住院时间方面存在统计学显著差异,但急性护理方面无差异。总康复费用以及入院和出院时的DRS和FIM评分在两组之间也显示出统计学显著差异。老年患者在DRS和FIM量表上的进展效率明显较低。老年患者在DRS量表上每提高一个单位产生的费用明显更多,但在FIM量表上并非如此。采用卡方分析,发现老年患者(80.5%)和年轻患者(94.4%)回家出院率存在统计学显著差异。
本研究结果与早期样本量较小的研究结果相似。观察到的主要差异包括,老年TBI患者住院康复进展明显更慢且成本更高,以及老年患者社区出院率明显更低。然而,即使在两种情况下住院时间都在缩短,老年TBI患者的社区出院率仍然令人鼓舞。