Watkins Jeffrey C, Jane David E
Department of Pharmacology, MRC Centre for Synaptic Plasticity, School of Medical Sciences, University of Bristol, BS8 1TD.
Br J Pharmacol. 2006 Jan;147 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S100-8. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjp.0706444.
Glutamatergic synaptic transmission in the mammalian central nervous system was slowly established over a period of some 20 years, dating from the 1950s. Realisation that glutamate and like amino acids (collectively known as excitatory amino acids (EAA)) mediated their excitatory actions via multiple receptors preceded establishment of these receptors as synaptic transmitter receptors. EAA receptors were initially classified as N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) and non-NMDA receptors, the latter subdivided into quisqualate (later AMPA) and kainate receptors after agonists that appeared to activate these receptors preferentially, and by their sensitivity to a range of differentially acting antagonists developed progressively during the 1970s. NMDA receptors were definitively shown to be synaptic receptors on spinal neurones by the sensitivity of certain excitatory pathways in the spinal cord to a range of specific NMDA receptor antagonists. Importantly, specific NMDA receptor antagonists appeared to be less effective at synapses in higher centres. In contrast, antagonists that also blocked non-NMDA as well as NMDA receptors were almost universally effective at blocking synaptic excitation within the brain and spinal cord, establishing both the existence and ubiquity of non-NMDA synaptic receptor systems throughout the CNS. In the early 1980s, NMDA receptors were shown to be involved in several central synaptic pathways, acting in concert with non-NMDA receptors under conditions where a protracted excitatory postsynaptic potential was effected in response to intense stimulation of presynaptic fibres. Such activation of NMDA receptors together with non-NMDA receptors led to the phenomenon of long-term potentiation (LTP), associated with lasting changes in synaptic efficacy (synaptic plasticity) and considered to be an important process in memory and learning. During the 1980s, it was shown that certain glutamate receptors in the brain mediated biochemical changes that were not susceptible to NMDA or non-NMDA receptor antagonists. This dichotomy was resolved in the early 1990s by the techniques of molecular biology, which identified two families of glutamate-binding receptor proteins (ionotropic (iGlu) and metabotropic (mGlu) receptors). Development of antagonists binding to specific protein subunits is currently enabling precise identification of discrete iGlu or mGlu receptor subtypes that participate in a range of central synaptic processes, including synaptic plasticity.
哺乳动物中枢神经系统中的谷氨酸能突触传递是在大约20年的时间里逐渐建立起来的,始于20世纪50年代。在这些受体被确立为突触递质受体之前,人们就已经认识到谷氨酸和类似氨基酸(统称为兴奋性氨基酸(EAA))是通过多种受体介导其兴奋作用的。EAA受体最初被分为N-甲基-D-天冬氨酸(NMDA)受体和非NMDA受体,后者在20世纪70年代根据似乎优先激活这些受体的激动剂,以及它们对一系列不同作用拮抗剂的敏感性,进一步细分为quisqualate(后来的AMPA)受体和海人藻酸受体。通过脊髓中某些兴奋性通路对一系列特定NMDA受体拮抗剂的敏感性,明确表明NMDA受体是脊髓神经元上的突触受体。重要的是,特定的NMDA受体拮抗剂在高级中枢的突触处似乎效果较差。相比之下,同时阻断非NMDA和NMDA受体的拮抗剂几乎在整个脑和脊髓中普遍有效地阻断突触兴奋,从而确立了非NMDA突触受体系统在整个中枢神经系统中的存在和普遍性。在20世纪80年代早期,研究表明NMDA受体参与了几条中枢突触通路,在对突触前纤维进行强烈刺激从而产生持久的兴奋性突触后电位的情况下,与非NMDA受体协同作用。NMDA受体与非NMDA受体的这种共同激活导致了长时程增强(LTP)现象,这与突触效能的持久变化(突触可塑性)相关,并被认为是记忆和学习中的一个重要过程。在20世纪80年代,研究表明大脑中的某些谷氨酸受体介导了不受NMDA或非NMDA受体拮抗剂影响的生化变化。这种二分法在20世纪90年代早期通过分子生物学技术得到了解决,该技术鉴定出了两个谷氨酸结合受体蛋白家族(离子型(iGlu)和代谢型(mGlu)受体)。目前,结合特定蛋白质亚基的拮抗剂的开发使得能够精确识别参与包括突触可塑性在内的一系列中枢突触过程的离散iGlu或mGlu受体亚型。