Wohlreich Madelaine M, Mallinckrodt Craig H, Watkin John G, Wilson Michael G, Greist John H, Delgado Pedro L, Fava Maurizio
Lilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly & Company, Indianapolis, IN 46285, USA.
Ann Clin Psychiatry. 2005 Oct-Dec;17(4):259-68. doi: 10.1080/10401230500296402.
Approximately half of all treated depressed patients fail to show adequate response to their initially prescribed antidepressant medication. Switching to another medication represents one possible next-step approach for nonresponsive or partially responsive patients. However, specific techniques for switching between antidepressants have not been well studied. We examined the efficacy and tolerability associated with a switch from a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor (SSRI) or venlafaxine to duloxetine.
All patients met criteria for major depressive disorder as defined in DSM-IV. Patients (N = 88) exhibiting suboptimal response or poor tolerability to their current antidepressant medication (citalopram <or=40 mg/d, escitalopram <or=20 mg/d, fluvoxamine <or=150 mg/d, paroxetine <or=40 mg/d, sertraline <or=150 mg/d, or venlafaxine <or=150 mg/d) were switched to duloxetine 60 mg once-daily (QD) without intermediate tapering or titration ("switching" group). A comparator group (N = 67), comprising patients not currently receiving antidepressant medication, initiated duloxetine therapy at 60 mg QD ("initiating" group). Safety assessments included comparisons of discontinuation rates, treatment-emergent adverse events, and changes in vital signs. Efficacy measures included the HAMD(17), Hamilton Anxiety Scale (HAMA), and the Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) scale.
The efficacy of duloxetine in switched patients did not differ significantly from that observed in untreated patients initiating duloxetine therapy (mean changes: HAMD(17) total score: -12.3 vs. -12.6; HAMA: -9.36 vs. -9.55, CGI-S: -1.94 vs. -2.12, respectively). However, the rate of discontinuation due to adverse events among patients switched to duloxetine was significantly lower than that in patients initiating duloxetine therapy (4.5% vs. 17.9%, p = .008). Treatment-emergent adverse events occurring in >or=10% of patients in both treatment groups were nausea, headache, dry mouth, insomnia, and diarrhea. Patients switched to duloxetine reported significantly lower rates of nausea and fatigue compared with patients initiating duloxetine.
In this study, the efficacy of duloxetine in switched patients was comparable to that observed in patients initiating duloxetine therapy. Immediate switching from an SSRI or venlafaxine to duloxetine (60 mg QD) was well tolerated.
在所有接受治疗的抑郁症患者中,约有一半对最初开具的抗抑郁药物未显示出足够的反应。对于无反应或部分反应的患者,换用另一种药物是一种可能的下一步治疗方法。然而,抗抑郁药物之间换药的具体技术尚未得到充分研究。我们研究了从选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRI)或文拉法辛换用度洛西汀的疗效和耐受性。
所有患者均符合《精神疾病诊断与统计手册》第四版(DSM-IV)中重度抑郁症的标准。对当前抗抑郁药物(西酞普兰≤40mg/d、艾司西酞普兰≤20mg/d、氟伏沙明≤150mg/d、帕罗西汀≤40mg/d、舍曲林≤150mg/d或文拉法辛≤150mg/d)反应欠佳或耐受性差的患者(N = 88),直接换用度洛西汀60mg每日一次(QD),不进行中间减量或滴定(“换药”组)。一个对照组(N = 67),由目前未接受抗抑郁药物治疗的患者组成,以60mg QD开始度洛西汀治疗(“起始治疗”组)。安全性评估包括停药率、治疗中出现的不良事件以及生命体征变化的比较。疗效指标包括汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD[17])、汉密尔顿焦虑量表(HAMA)和临床总体印象严重程度(CGI-S)量表。
度洛西汀在换药患者中的疗效与开始度洛西汀治疗的未治疗患者中观察到的疗效无显著差异(平均变化:HAMD[17]总分:-12.3对-12.6;HAMA:-9.36对-9.55,CGI-S:-1.94对-2.12)。然而,换用度洛西汀的患者因不良事件停药的发生率显著低于开始度洛西汀治疗的患者(4.5%对17.9%,p = 0.008)。两个治疗组中≥10%的患者出现的治疗中出现的不良事件为恶心、头痛、口干、失眠和腹泻。与开始度洛西汀治疗的患者相比,换用度洛西汀治疗的患者恶心和疲劳发生率显著较低。
在本研究中,度洛西汀在换药患者中的疗效与开始度洛西汀治疗的患者中观察到的疗效相当。从SSRI或文拉法辛直接换用度洛西汀(60mg QD)耐受性良好。