Wohlreich Madelaine M, Martinez James M, Mallinckrodt Craig H, Prakash Apurva, Watkin John G, Fava Maurizio
Lilly Research Laboratories, Eli Lilly & Co, Indianapolis, IN 46285, USA.
J Clin Psychopharmacol. 2005 Dec;25(6):552-60. doi: 10.1097/01.jcp.0000185429.10053.c8.
This study compared the stabilized duloxetine dose through approximately 12 weeks of treatment in patients initiating duloxetine therapy with that in patients switching to duloxetine from selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors or venlafaxine. All patients met Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition criteria for major depressive disorder. Patients (n = 112) exhibiting suboptimal response or poor tolerability to their current antidepressant medication (citalopram, escitalopram, fluvoxamine, paroxetine, sertraline, or venlafaxine) were switched to duloxetine 60 mg once daily (QD) without intermediate tapering or titration ("switching" group). A comparator group (n = 137), comprising patients not currently receiving antidepressant medication, was randomized to receive duloxetine 30 or 60 mg QD ("initiating" group). At the end of week 1, patients receiving 30 mg QD had their dose increased to 60 mg QD. During the remainder of the study, each patient's duloxetine dose could be titrated on the basis of degree of response within a range from 60 to 120 mg QD, with 90 mg QD as an intermediate dose. At the study end point, approximately one third of the patients in each treatment group were stabilized at each of the 3 studied duloxetine doses (60, 90, and 120 mg QD), and the distribution of stabilized doses among patients initiating duloxetine therapy did not differ significantly from that observed in patients switching to duloxetine. The efficacy of duloxetine in patients switching from selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor/venlafaxine did not differ significantly from that observed in untreated patients initiating duloxetine therapy (baseline-to-end point mean changes: 17-Item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression total score, -13.1 vs. -13.5; Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety, -10.6 vs. -10.3; and Clinical Global Impression of Severity, -2.22 vs. -2.38, respectively). The rate of discontinuation caused by adverse events among patients switched to duloxetine was significantly lower than that in patients initiating duloxetine therapy (6.3% vs. 16.1%, P = 0.018). Treatment-emergent adverse events occurring in more than 10% of patients in both treatment groups were nausea, headache, dry mouth, insomnia, diarrhea, and constipation. In the first week of therapy, patients switched to duloxetine reported significantly lower rates of headache and fatigue compared with patients initiating duloxetine. Thus, the efficacy of duloxetine in switched patients was comparable to that observed in patients initiating duloxetine therapy. Immediate switching from a selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor or venlafaxine to duloxetine (60 mg QD) was well tolerated.
本研究比较了起始度洛西汀治疗的患者与从选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂或文拉法辛换用度洛西汀的患者在约12周治疗期内的度洛西汀稳定剂量。所有患者均符合《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》第四版中重度抑郁症的标准。对当前抗抑郁药物(西酞普兰、艾司西酞普兰、氟伏沙明、帕罗西汀、舍曲林或文拉法辛)反应欠佳或耐受性差的患者(n = 112)直接换用度洛西汀,每日一次60 mg(QD),无需中间递减或滴定(“换药”组)。一个对照组(n = 137),由目前未接受抗抑郁药物治疗的患者组成,随机接受度洛西汀30或60 mg QD(“起始治疗”组)。在第1周结束时,接受30 mg QD治疗的患者将剂量增至60 mg QD。在研究的剩余时间里,可根据反应程度将每位患者的度洛西汀剂量在60至120 mg QD范围内滴定,90 mg QD作为中间剂量。在研究终点,每个治疗组中约三分之一的患者在3个研究的度洛西汀剂量(60、90和120 mg QD)下达到稳定状态,起始度洛西汀治疗的患者中稳定剂量的分布与换用度洛西汀的患者中观察到的情况无显著差异。从选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂/文拉法辛换用度洛西汀的患者中,度洛西汀的疗效与未治疗而起始度洛西汀治疗患者中观察到疗效无显著差异(基线至终点的平均变化:17项汉密尔顿抑郁评定量表总分,-13.1对-13.5;汉密尔顿焦虑评定量表,-10.6对-10.3;临床总体印象严重程度,-2.22对-2.38)。换用度洛西汀的患者中因不良事件导致停药的发生率显著低于起始度洛西汀治疗的患者(6.3%对16.1%;P = 0.018)。两个治疗组中超过10%患者出现的治疗中出现的不良事件为恶心、头痛、口干、失眠、腹泻和便秘。在治疗的第一周,换用度洛西汀的患者报告的头痛和疲劳发生率显著低于起始度洛西汀治疗的患者。因此,度洛西汀在换药患者中的疗效与起始度洛西汀治疗患者中观察到的疗效相当。从选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂或文拉法辛直接换用度洛西汀(60 mg QD)耐受性良好。