Department of Psychiatry, University of British Columbia, Mood Disorders Centre, UBC Hospital, Vancouver, Canada.
Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2010 Jul;25(4):199-203. doi: 10.1097/YIC.0b013e32833948d8.
The objective of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of escitalopram versus serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs) as second step treatment (defined operationally as poor response or intolerability to an antidepressant) for major depressive disorder (MDD). Results from all eligible head-to-head clinical trials of MDD (which excluded patients who earlier failed two or more antidepressants) sponsored by Lundbeck or Forest comparing escitalopram and SNRIs (venlafaxine and duloxetine) were pooled. A second step treatment subgroup was identified, defined as patients treated earlier with any antidepressant in the 6-month period before baseline. Data from three clinical trials were included in the analysis; 132 patients were identified in the second step treatment subgroup (66 in each of the escitalopram and SNRI groups). The primary efficacy analysis showed that the patients subsequently treated with escitalopram had significantly lower Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale total scores after 8 weeks compared with those subsequently treated with SNRIs (difference = -6.4, P<0.0001). Escitalopram treatment was also associated with higher clinical response (73 vs. 44%, P=0.0004) and remission rates (62 vs. 41%, P=0.0083) compared with subsequent treatment with SNRIs. Escitalopram showed a better tolerability profile with lower all-cause withdrawals from study (9 vs. 23%, P<0.04) and lower withdrawals because of adverse events (2 vs. 17%, P<0.003). In conclusion, escitalopram is associated with a better efficacy and tolerability profile than SNRIs (duloxetine and venlafaxine) when used as a second step treatment in patients with MDD. These results should be confirmed in prospective randomized clinical trials.
本研究旨在评估艾司西酞普兰治疗重度抑郁症(MDD)的疗效和耐受性,具体定义为对某种抗抑郁药物反应不佳或不耐受。本研究汇总了由灵北或 Forest 赞助的所有合格的 MDD 头对头临床试验(排除了之前两种或更多抗抑郁药治疗失败的患者)的结果,这些研究将艾司西酞普兰与 5-羟色胺和去甲肾上腺素再摄取抑制剂(SNRIs,文拉法辛和度洛西汀)进行了比较。定义了一个第二步治疗亚组,即基线前 6 个月内使用过任何抗抑郁药的患者。共有三项临床试验的数据被纳入分析,在第二步治疗亚组中,共发现 132 例患者(艾司西酞普兰组和 SNRI 组各 66 例)。主要疗效分析显示,与随后接受 SNRIs 治疗的患者相比,随后接受艾司西酞普兰治疗的患者在 8 周时的蒙哥马利抑郁评定量表总分显著降低(差值=-6.4,P<0.0001)。与随后接受 SNRIs 治疗的患者相比,艾司西酞普兰治疗的临床应答率(73% vs. 44%,P=0.0004)和缓解率(62% vs. 41%,P=0.0083)也更高。与随后接受 SNRIs 治疗的患者相比,艾司西酞普兰的耐受性更好,总停药率(9% vs. 23%,P<0.04)和因不良事件停药率(2% vs. 17%,P<0.003)更低。总之,与 SNRIs(度洛西汀和文拉法辛)相比,艾司西酞普兰作为 MDD 患者的第二步治疗药物,具有更好的疗效和耐受性。这些结果应在前瞻性随机临床试验中得到证实。