de Sisti Antonio, Toussaint Jean-François, Lavergne Thomas, Ollitrault Jacky, Abergel Eric, Paziaud Olivier, Ait Said Mina, Sader Raif, LE Heuzey Jean-Yves, Guize Louis
Cardiology Unit, Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, Paris, France.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2005 Dec;28(12):1260-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2005.00266.x.
In dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) patients (pts) with cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) for ventricular dyssynchrony, long-term predictors of mortality and morbidity remain poorly investigated.
We reviewed data of 102 pts, 68 +/- 10 years, NYHA Class II-IV (14 Class II, 67 Class III, 21 Class IV), who benefited from CRT (69 CRT, 33 CRT-ICD). Fifty-two patients had an ischemic DCM, 36 a previously implanted conventional PM/ICD, 29 a permanent atrial fibrillation, and 19 needed dobutamine in the month preceding implant. QRS duration was 187 +/- 35 ms, left ventricular end-diastolic diameter 72 +/- 10 mm, mitral regurgitation severity 1.9 +/- 0.8, echographic aorto-pulmonary electromechanical delay 61.5 +/- 25 ms and septo-lateral left intraventricular delay 86 +/- 56 ms, pulmonary artery pressure (PAP) 43 +/- 11 mmHg, angioscintigraphic left ventricular ejection fraction (EF) 20 +/- 9%, and right ventricular EF 30.5 +/- 14%. Over a mean follow-up of 23 +/- 20 months, 26 pts died (18 heart failures (HFs), 1 arrhythmic storm, 7 noncardiac deaths). Positive univariate predictors of death from any cause were NYHA Class IV (P < 0.001), and need for dobutamine the month preceding CRT (P < 0.008), while use of beta-blocking agents (P < 0.08) and left ventricular EF (P < 0.09) were negative ones. NYHA Class IV was the only independent predictor at multivariate analysis (P < 0.01). Survival at 24 months was 85% in Class II, 80% in Class III, and 37% in Class IV (II vs III, P = ns; III vs IV, P < 0.001). When using a composite endpoint of death from any cause and unplanned rehospitalization for a major cardiovascular event, there were 48 events (14 HF deaths, 3 noncardiac deaths, 26 HF rehospitalizations, 2 paroxysmal atrial fibrillation, 2 sustained ventricular tachycardia, 1 nonfatal pulmonary embolism). Predictors of death from any cause/unplanned rehospitalization for a major cardiovascular event in the follow-up were NYHA Class IV (P < 0.001), need for dobutamine during the month preceding CRT (P < 0.002), and PAP (<0.02). NYHA Class IV was the only independent predictor at multivariate analysis (P < 0.05). Event-free proportion at 24 months was 70% in Class II, 64% in Class III, and 37% in Class IV (II vs III, P = ns; III vs IV, P < 0.01). When considering determinants of mortality only in NYHA Class IV patients, no variable was significantly correlated to mortality. Need for dobutamine during the last month preceding CRT did not add an adjunctive mortality risk.
Baseline NYHA Class IV at implantation appears as the most important determinant of a poor clinical outcome in terms of both mortality and morbidity. No predictive criteria seem available for NYHA Class IV patients, in order to discriminate who will die after CRT and who will not. NYHA Class IV strongly influences the clinical outcome, suggesting that, in future studies planned on mortality and rehospitalization as major endpoints, baseline NYHA Class IV should be separately taken into account.
在接受心脏再同步治疗(CRT)以纠正心室不同步的扩张型心肌病(DCM)患者中,死亡率和发病率的长期预测因素仍未得到充分研究。
我们回顾了102例患者的数据,年龄68±10岁,纽约心脏协会(NYHA)心功能分级为II-IV级(II级14例,III级67例,IV级21例),这些患者接受了CRT治疗(69例CRT,33例CRT-ICD)。52例患者患有缺血性DCM,36例曾植入传统起搏器/植入式心律转复除颤器(ICD),29例患有永久性心房颤动,19例在植入前一个月需要多巴酚丁胺。QRS时限为187±35毫秒,左心室舒张末期直径72±10毫米,二尖瓣反流严重程度1.9±0.8,超声心动图显示主动脉-肺动脉机电延迟61.5±25毫秒,室间隔-侧壁左心室内延迟86±56毫秒,肺动脉压(PAP)43±11毫米汞柱,血管造影左心室射血分数(EF)20±9%,右心室EF 30.5±14%。平均随访23±20个月,26例患者死亡(18例死于心力衰竭(HF),1例死于心律失常风暴,7例死于非心脏原因)。任何原因导致死亡的单因素阳性预测因素为NYHA IV级(P<0.001),以及CRT前一个月需要多巴酚丁胺(P<0.008),而使用β受体阻滞剂(P<0.08)和左心室EF(P<0.09)为阴性预测因素。NYHA IV级是多因素分析中唯一的独立预测因素(P<0.01)。II级患者24个月生存率为85%,III级为80%,IV级为37%(II级与III级比较,P=无显著性差异;III级与IV级比较,P<0.001)。当使用任何原因导致的死亡和因重大心血管事件计划外再次住院的复合终点时,有48例事件(14例HF死亡,3例非心脏死亡,26例HF再次住院,2例阵发性心房颤动,2例持续性室性心动过速,1例非致命性肺栓塞)。随访中任何原因导致的死亡/因重大心血管事件计划外再次住院的预测因素为NYHA IV级(P<0.001),CRT前一个月需要多巴酚丁胺(P<0.002),以及PAP(<0.02)。NYHA IV级是多因素分析中唯一的独立预测因素(P<0.05)。II级患者24个月无事件比例为70%,III级为64%,IV级为37%(II级与III级比较,P=无显著性差异;III级与IV级比较,P<0.01)。仅考虑NYHA IV级患者的死亡率决定因素时,没有变量与死亡率显著相关。CRT前最后一个月需要多巴酚丁胺并未增加额外的死亡风险。
植入时的基线NYHA IV级似乎是死亡率和发病率方面不良临床结局的最重要决定因素。对于NYHA IV级患者,似乎没有可用的预测标准来区分哪些患者在CRT后会死亡,哪些不会。NYHA IV级强烈影响临床结局,这表明在未来计划以死亡率和再次住院作为主要终点的研究中,应单独考虑基线NYHA IV级。