Khoshbaten Manouchehr, Fattahi Ebrahim, Naderi Nosratollah, Khaleghian Farzaneh, Rezailashkajani Mohammadreza
Liver and Gastrointestinal Diseases Research Center, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran.
BMC Gastroenterol. 2006 Jan 11;6:2. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-6-2.
Gastrointestinal bleeding is a common problem and its most common etiology is peptic ulcer disease. Ulcer rebleeding is considered a perilous complication for patients. To reduce the rate of rebleeding and to fasten the improvement of patients' general conditions, most emergency departments in Iran use H2-blockers before endoscopic procedures (i.e. intravenous omeprazole is not available in Iran). The aim of this study was to compare therapeutic effects of oral omeprazole and intravenous cimetidine on reducing rebleeding rates, duration of hospitalization, and the need for blood transfusion in duodenal ulcer patients.
In this clinical trial, 80 patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding due to duodenal peptic ulcer and endoscopic evidence of rebleeding referring to emergency departments of Imam and Sina hospitals in Tabriz, Iran were randomly assigned to two equal groups; one was treated with intravenous cimetidine 800 mg per day and the other, with 40 mg oral omeprazole per day.
No statistically significant difference was found between cimetidine and omeprazole groups in regards to sex, age, alcohol consumption, cigarette smoking, NSAID consumption, endoscopic evidence of rebleeding, mean hemoglobin and mean BUN levels on admission, duration of hospitalization and the mean time of rebleeding. However, the need for blood transfusion was much lower in omeprazole than in cimetidine group (mean: 1.68 versus 3.58 units, respectively; p < 0.003). Moreover, rebleeding rate was significantly lower in omeprazole group (15%) than in cimetidine group (50%) (p < 0.001).
This study demonstrated that oral omeprazole significantly excels intravenous cimetidine in reducing the need for blood transfusion and lowering rebleeding rates in patients with upper gastrointestinal bleeding. Though not statistically significant (p = 0.074), shorter periods of hospitalization were found for omeprazole group which merits consideration for cost minimization.
胃肠道出血是一个常见问题,其最常见的病因是消化性溃疡病。溃疡再出血被认为是患者的一种危险并发症。为降低再出血率并加快患者一般状况的改善,伊朗的大多数急诊科在内镜检查前使用H2阻滞剂(即伊朗没有静脉用奥美拉唑)。本研究的目的是比较口服奥美拉唑和静脉用西咪替丁在降低十二指肠溃疡患者再出血率、住院时间和输血需求方面的治疗效果。
在这项临床试验中,80例因十二指肠消化性溃疡导致上消化道出血且有内镜再出血证据的患者被转诊至伊朗大不里士伊玛目医院和西纳医院急诊科,随机分为两组,每组人数相等;一组每天静脉注射800毫克西咪替丁,另一组每天口服40毫克奥美拉唑。
西咪替丁组和奥美拉唑组在性别、年龄、饮酒、吸烟、非甾体抗炎药使用、内镜再出血证据、入院时平均血红蛋白和平均尿素氮水平、住院时间和再出血平均时间方面无统计学显著差异。然而,奥美拉唑组的输血需求远低于西咪替丁组(平均分别为1.68单位和3.58单位;p<0.003)。此外,奥美拉唑组的再出血率(15%)显著低于西咪替丁组(50%)(p<0.001)。
本研究表明,口服奥美拉唑在降低上消化道出血患者的输血需求和再出血率方面明显优于静脉用西咪替丁。虽然奥美拉唑组住院时间较短无统计学显著差异(p=0.074),但为使成本最小化值得考虑。