Rigatelli Gianluca
Int J Cardiol. 2006 Nov 10;113(2):149-52. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2005.03.081. Epub 2006 Jan 3.
Doppler ultrasound (US), computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are gaining wide acceptance as gold standard for diagnosing peripheral artery disease at thoracic and abdominal aorta level and infrainguinal arteries. A different case is that of renal artery stenosis (RAS): noninvasive techniques, CT and MRI in particular, failed to become the new gold standard. Image interpretation and artifacts seems to invalidate MRI and CT sensitivity and specificity that remain quite low. The debacle of noninvasive imaging of renal arteries may have important reflexes on the invasive cardiology practice. In the light of the results of noninvasive tests for renal artery stenosis, the angiography of renal vessels performed at the time of coronary artery angiography may became a new tool for invasive professional to optimize the diagnosis of renal artery stenosis at least in patients scheduled for coronary angiography. The invasive cardiologist, today more than ever, has the chance to really impact the diagnosis and therapy of patients with renovascular disease and the prognosis of patients with both coronary artery and renal artery disease.
多普勒超声(US)、计算机断层扫描(CT)和磁共振成像(MRI)作为诊断胸主动脉和腹主动脉以及腹股沟下动脉水平外周动脉疾病的金标准正被广泛接受。肾动脉狭窄(RAS)的情况则不同:非侵入性技术,尤其是CT和MRI,未能成为新的金标准。图像解读和伪影似乎使MRI和CT的敏感性和特异性无效,其敏感性和特异性仍然相当低。肾动脉非侵入性成像的失败可能对侵入性心脏病学实践产生重要影响。根据肾动脉狭窄非侵入性检查的结果,在冠状动脉造影时进行的肾血管造影可能成为侵入性专业人员优化肾动脉狭窄诊断的新工具,至少对于计划进行冠状动脉造影的患者是如此。如今,侵入性心脏病专家比以往任何时候都更有机会真正影响肾血管疾病患者的诊断和治疗以及冠状动脉和肾动脉疾病患者的预后。