Cordier Françoise, Ny Jean-François Le
Laboratoire de Psychologie, Université de Poitiers, Poitiers, France.
Behav Res Methods. 2005 Aug;37(3):528-37. doi: 10.3758/bf03192724.
Familiarity with a word can be divided into two main components: familiarity with the form of the word (due to both its lexicality and its specific form) and familiarity with its meaning. In this study, ratings of familiarity were compared for words whose meaning was unknown to participants (UM words), for words of known meaning (KM words), and for unknown words (U words). Linguistic and experiential frequencies were equivalent. Rated familiarity was lower for UM than KM words and even lower for U words. Next, we built pseudowords from these stimuli by changing one letter and submitted them to two familiarity rating tasks that differed in the nature of the additional stimuli: either only nonwords or nonwords plus words. It was assumed that familiarity ratings would be lower for pseudowords built from UM words than for pseudowords built from KM words. The data were consistent with this assumption, and ratings depended on the initial categories of stimuli. These results support the view that usual word familiarity has two components, familiarity with form and familiarity with meaning, and a double source, processing of word form and processing of word meaning. The full set of these materials and norms may be downloaded from www.psychonomic.org/archive.
对单词形式的熟悉度(这既归因于其词汇性,也归因于其特定形式)以及对其意义的熟悉度。在本研究中,对参与者而言意义未知的单词(UM单词)、已知意义的单词(KM单词)以及未知单词(U单词)的熟悉度评级进行了比较。语言频率和经验频率是相等的。UM单词的评级熟悉度低于KM单词,而U单词的评级熟悉度更低。接下来,我们通过改变一个字母从这些刺激材料中构建伪词,并将它们提交到两个熟悉度评级任务中,这两个任务在额外刺激的性质上有所不同:要么只有非单词,要么是非单词加单词。假设由UM单词构建的伪词的熟悉度评级会低于由KM单词构建的伪词。数据与这一假设一致,并且评级取决于刺激的初始类别。这些结果支持了这样一种观点,即通常的单词熟悉度有两个成分,对形式的熟悉度和对意义的熟悉度,以及两个来源,单词形式的加工和单词意义的加工。这些材料和规范的完整集合可从www.psychonomic.org/archive下载。