• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[用于放射治疗计划的CT值校准及其影响因素]

[Calibration of CT values used for radiation treatment planning and its impact factors].

作者信息

Qi Zhen-Yu, Huang Shao-Min, Deng Xiao-Wu

机构信息

State Key Laboratory of Oncology in Southern China, Guangzhou, Guangdong 510060, P. R. China.

出版信息

Ai Zheng. 2006 Jan;25(1):110-4.

PMID:16405763
Abstract

BACKGROUND & OBJECTIVE: CT values are the basis that radiation treatment planning system (TPS) used to calculate the dose distribution of an irradiation treatment plan. However, the CT values of a certain tissue could be very different when it is scanned with dissimilar parameters or acquisition modes, and would add errors to the planning dose calculation. This study was designed to investigate the factors that may impact the calibration of quantitative CT used for radiation treatment planning, and determine the relative importance of these factors.

METHODS

CT values of different tissue substitute rods under different CT scanning conditions were measured and compared using RMI 467 phantom. Scanning conditions were classified into 3 modes: (1) evaluating the effect of CT parameters on CT density map by choosing different voltage, slice thickness and acquisition modalities; (2) evaluating the geometric effects of patient size, shape and position in the field of view (FOV) by changing different position of tissue substitute rods in the phantom; (3) evaluating the effect of patient support table on quantitative CT by comparing CT values acquired on patient support table top with those acquired in air. The relative importance leading to CT value error of the 3 modes was also analyzed.

RESULTS

For high-density cortical bone, the applied voltage was the most relevant factor resulting in difference to the reconstructed Hounsfield values of about 150 units, which was 12.7% when scanning voltage changed from 120 KV to 150 KV. The geometric disturbance from different patient sizes and shapes in the FOV could be minimized (less than 10 units for cortical bone). The CT values acquired on the table top varied about 26.34% for water and 293.84% for solid water when compared with those acquired in air.

CONCLUSIONS

CT scan voltage and patient support table top scattering make the most impacts to CT values, which may result in error of TPS dose calculation. Inhomogeneous phantoms like RMI 467 can be used to perform QA tests, and calibrations for quantitative CT and reduce the dose error of radiation treatment. It is advisable that a complete set of CT parameters and image acquisition modalities should be determined as part of radiotherapy planning protocols. Patient setup and immobilization modality during CT acquisition should be the same as those during treatment delivery, so as to increase the accuracy of the CT density map for TPS.

摘要

背景与目的

CT值是放射治疗计划系统(TPS)用于计算照射治疗计划剂量分布的基础。然而,当用不同参数或采集模式扫描某一组织时,其CT值可能会有很大差异,这会给计划剂量计算增加误差。本研究旨在调查可能影响用于放射治疗计划的定量CT校准的因素,并确定这些因素的相对重要性。

方法

使用RMI 467体模测量并比较不同CT扫描条件下不同组织替代棒的CT值。扫描条件分为3种模式:(1)通过选择不同的电压、层厚和采集方式评估CT参数对CT密度图的影响;(2)通过改变体模中组织替代棒的不同位置评估患者大小、形状和视野(FOV)内位置的几何效应;(3)通过比较在患者支撑台面上获取的CT值与在空气中获取的CT值评估患者支撑台对定量CT的影响。还分析了导致3种模式CT值误差的相对重要性。

结果

对于高密度皮质骨,施加的电压是导致重建的亨氏值差异最大的相关因素,约为150个单位,当扫描电压从120 kV变为150 kV时,差异为12.7%。视野内不同患者大小和形状产生的几何干扰可降至最低(皮质骨小于10个单位)。与在空气中获取的CT值相比,在台面上获取的水的CT值变化约26.34%,固体水的CT值变化约293.84%。

结论

CT扫描电压和患者支撑台面散射对CT值影响最大,这可能导致TPS剂量计算误差。像RMI 467这样的非均匀体模可用于进行质量保证测试、定量CT校准并减少放射治疗的剂量误差。建议将一整套CT参数和图像采集模式作为放射治疗计划方案的一部分确定下来。CT采集期间的患者摆位和固定方式应与治疗时相同,以提高用于TPS的CT密度图的准确性。

相似文献

1
[Calibration of CT values used for radiation treatment planning and its impact factors].[用于放射治疗计划的CT值校准及其影响因素]
Ai Zheng. 2006 Jan;25(1):110-4.
2
Dose calculation on kV cone beam CT images: an investigation of the Hu-density conversion stability and dose accuracy using the site-specific calibration.千伏级锥形束CT图像的剂量计算:利用特定部位校准对Hu密度转换稳定性和剂量准确性的研究
Med Dosim. 2010 Autumn;35(3):195-207. doi: 10.1016/j.meddos.2009.06.001. Epub 2009 Jul 15.
3
A quantitative image quality comparison of four different image guided radiotherapy devices.四种不同图像引导放射治疗设备的定量图像质量比较。
Radiother Oncol. 2008 Jan;86(1):20-4. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2007.10.035. Epub 2007 Nov 26.
4
Effects of geometric distortion in 0.2T MRI on radiotherapy treatment planning of prostate cancer.0.2T磁共振成像中几何畸变对前列腺癌放射治疗计划的影响。
Radiother Oncol. 2004 Apr;71(1):55-64. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2003.12.012.
5
Evaluating the impact of extended field-of-view CT reconstructions on CT values and dosimetric accuracy for radiation therapy.评估扩展视野 CT 重建对放射治疗 CT 值和剂量学准确性的影响。
Med Phys. 2019 Feb;46(2):892-901. doi: 10.1002/mp.13299. Epub 2018 Dec 14.
6
The use of megavoltage CT (MVCT) images for dose recomputations.使用兆伏级CT(MVCT)图像进行剂量重新计算。
Phys Med Biol. 2005 Sep 21;50(18):4259-76. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/50/18/002. Epub 2005 Aug 31.
7
The adaptation of megavoltage cone beam CT for use in standard radiotherapy treatment planning.兆伏级锥形束CT在标准放射治疗计划中的应用适应性。
Phys Med Biol. 2009 Apr 7;54(7):2067-77. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/54/7/014. Epub 2009 Mar 13.
8
A simulation of MRI based dose calculations on the basis of radiotherapy planning CT images.基于放射治疗计划CT图像的磁共振成像(MRI)剂量计算模拟。
Acta Oncol. 2008;47(7):1294-302. doi: 10.1080/02841860802256426.
9
Characteristics and clinical application of a treatment simulator with Ct-option.具有CT选项的治疗模拟器的特性与临床应用
Radiother Oncol. 1999 Mar;50(3):355-66. doi: 10.1016/s0167-8140(99)00033-x.
10
Estimation of the delivered patient dose in lung IMRT treatment based on deformable registration of 4D-CT data and Monte Carlo simulations.基于4D-CT数据的可变形配准和蒙特卡罗模拟估算肺部IMRT治疗中患者的实际剂量。
Phys Med Biol. 2006 Jun 7;51(11):2763-79. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/51/11/006. Epub 2006 May 17.

引用本文的文献

1
The Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO) clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.中国临床肿瘤学会(CSCO)鼻咽癌诊断与治疗临床指南。
Cancer Commun (Lond). 2021 Nov;41(11):1195-1227. doi: 10.1002/cac2.12218. Epub 2021 Oct 26.