Suppr超能文献

四种不同图像引导放射治疗设备的定量图像质量比较。

A quantitative image quality comparison of four different image guided radiotherapy devices.

作者信息

Stützel Julia, Oelfke Uwe, Nill Simeon

机构信息

German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Department of Medial Physics, Heidelberg, Germany.

出版信息

Radiother Oncol. 2008 Jan;86(1):20-4. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2007.10.035. Epub 2007 Nov 26.

Abstract

PURPOSE

A study to quantitatively compare the image quality of four different image guided radiotherapy (IGRT) devices based on phantom measurements with respect to the additional dose delivered to the patient.

METHODS

Images of three different head-sized phantoms (diameter 16-18 cm) were acquired with the following four IGRT-CT solutions: (i) the Siemens Primatom single slice fan beam computed tomography (CT) scanner with an acceleration voltage of 130 kV, (ii) a Tomotherapy HI-ART II unit using a fan beam scanner with an energy of 3.5 MeV and (iii) the Siemens Artíste prototype, providing the possibility to perform kV (121 kV) and MV (6 MV) cone beam (CB) CTs. For each device three scan protocols (named low, normal, high) were selected to yield the same weighted computed tomography dose index (CTDI(w)). Based on the individual inserts of the different phantoms the image quality achieved with each device at a certain dose level was characterized in terms of homogeneity, spatial resolution, signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and electron density-to-CT-number conversion.

RESULTS

Based on the current findings for head-sized phantoms all devices show an electron density-to-CT-number conversion almost independent of the imaging parameters and hence can be suited for treatment planning purposes. The evaluation of the image quality, however, points out clear differences due to the different energies and geometries. The Primatom standard CT scanner shows throughout the best performance, especially for soft tissue contrast and spatial resolution with low imaging doses. Reasonable soft tissue contrast can be obtained with slightly higher doses compared to the CT scanner with the kVCB and the Tomotherapy unit. In order to get similar results with the MVCB system a much higher dose needs to be applied to the patient.

CONCLUSION

Considering the entire investigations, especially in terms of contrast and spatial resolution, a rough tendency for decreasing image quality can be given: Primatom, Artíste prototype kVCB, Tomotherapy, Artíste prototype MVCB.

摘要

目的

开展一项研究,基于模体测量,对四种不同的图像引导放射治疗(IGRT)设备的图像质量进行定量比较,并考量其对患者的额外剂量。

方法

使用以下四种IGRT-CT设备采集三种不同头部尺寸模体(直径16 - 18厘米)的图像:(i)西门子Primatom单层扇束计算机断层扫描(CT)扫描仪,加速电压为130 kV;(ii)螺旋断层放射治疗系统HI-ART II,使用能量为3.5 MeV的扇束扫描仪;(iii)西门子Artíste原型机,可进行kV(121 kV)和MV(6 MV)锥形束(CB)CT扫描。对于每种设备,选择三种扫描协议(分别称为低、中、高)以产生相同的加权计算机断层扫描剂量指数(CTDI(w))。基于不同模体的单个插入物,在特定剂量水平下每种设备所达到的图像质量通过均匀性、空间分辨率、信噪比(SNR)、对比噪声比(CNR)以及电子密度与CT值转换来表征。

结果

基于目前对头部尺寸模体的研究结果,所有设备的电子密度与CT值转换几乎与成像参数无关,因此可适用于治疗计划。然而,图像质量评估指出,由于能量和几何结构不同,存在明显差异。Primatom标准CT扫描仪总体表现最佳,尤其是在低成像剂量下的软组织对比度和空间分辨率方面。与kV CB CT扫描仪和螺旋断层放射治疗系统相比,稍高剂量可获得合理的软组织对比度。为了在MV CB系统中获得类似结果,需要对患者施加更高得多的剂量。

结论

综合各项研究,特别是在对比度和空间分辨率方面,可以得出图像质量下降的大致趋势:Primatom、Artíste原型机kV CB、螺旋断层放射治疗系统、Artíste原型机MV CB。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验