Cyrus Chu C Y, Lee Ronald D
Institute of Economics, Academia Sinica.
Theor Popul Biol. 2006 Mar;69(2):193-201. doi: 10.1016/j.tpb.2005.11.004. Epub 2006 Jan 10.
How would resources be allocated among fertility, survival, and growth in an optimal life history? The budget constraint assumed by past treatments limits the energy used by each individual at each instant to what it produces at that instant. We consider under what conditions energy transfers from adults, which relax the rigid constraint by permitting energetic dependency and faster growth for the offspring, would be advantageous. In a sense, such transfers permit borrowing and lending across the life history. Higher survival and greater efficiency in energy production at older ages than younger both favor the evolution of transfers. We show that if such transfers are advantageous, then increased survival up to the age of making the transfers must co-evolve with the transfers themselves.
在最优生活史中,资源将如何在繁殖力、存活率和生长之间进行分配?过去的研究中所假设的预算约束将每个个体在每个时刻所使用的能量限制在该时刻所产生的能量范围内。我们思考在何种条件下,来自成年个体的能量转移会是有利的,这种转移通过允许能量依赖和使后代更快生长来放宽严格的约束。从某种意义上说,这种转移允许在整个生活史中进行借贷。与幼年相比,老年时更高的存活率和更高的能量生产效率都有利于能量转移的进化。我们表明,如果这种转移是有利的,那么在进行转移的年龄之前存活率的提高必须与转移本身共同进化。