Malinski Violet M
Hunter-Bellevue School of Nursing, Hunter College/City University of New York, New York, USA.
Nurs Sci Q. 2006 Jan;19(1):7-12; discussion 6. doi: 10.1177/0894318405284116.
In this column, the author provides a general overview of selected theories derived from Rogerian nursing science. After a brief discussion of the Rogerian perspective, she highlights representative theories. She suggests that ongoing development of proposed theories has been relatively slow for two main reasons. First, scholars still use the 1970 book as a major reference. Unfortunately, despite her promise to do so, Rogers never updated the 1970 book and admitted on many occasions that it would more accurately reflect her refinement of her science if a major portion of the pages were torn out. Second, theories were often proposed by doctoral candidates who changed focus in their careers postdoctorate. Despite this, there is a fascinating body of theories in various stages of development for Rogerian scholars to pursue.
在本专栏中，作者概述了源自罗杰斯护理科学的部分选定理论。在对罗杰斯的观点进行简要讨论后，她着重介绍了一些具有代表性的理论。她指出，这些提出的理论的持续发展相对缓慢，主要有两个原因。其一，学者们仍将1970年出版的那本书作为主要参考文献。遗憾的是，尽管罗杰斯承诺会更新，但她从未对1970年出版的那本书进行修订，并且多次承认，如果撕掉其中大部分书页，这本书会更准确地反映她对其科学的完善。其二，这些理论往往是由博士研究生提出的，而他们在博士后阶段改变了职业重点。尽管如此，仍有一批引人入胜的理论处于不同的发展阶段，可供罗杰斯学派的学者们探索。
