Okubo Suguru, Takahashi Miyako, Saito Tami, Kai Ichiro
School of Health Sciences and Nursing, Graduate School of Medicine, the University of Tokyo, 7-3-1 Hongo Bunkyo-ku Tokyo 113-0033, Japan.
Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi. 2005 Nov;52(11):928-33.
To address delayed language development associated with severe-to-profound congenital hearing loss (CHL), universal newborn hearing screening (UNHS) has been implemented in many countries. In Japan, approximately 27,000 neonates (2.5% of newborn) are screened annually through public-funded programs. While foreign literature highlights the need for assessment, in Japan this has hitherto not been evaluated in detail.
To investigate the efficacy of UNHS in Japan.
We used two criteria to evaluate UNHS; accuracy of screening and the effectiveness of early detection, and searched the major medical and social research journal data bases for related research papers. Eleven articles were identified providing information on accuracy of screening tests and two on effectiveness of early detection.
The effectiveness of UNHS in Japan is still equivocal because of the difficulties associated with differential diagnosis of hearing loss and normal hearing at the early stage of life and the lack of evidence on effectiveness of early intervention. Before nationwide implementation of UNHS, these issues should be fully investigated and evaluated.
为解决与重度至极重度先天性听力损失(CHL)相关的语言发育迟缓问题,许多国家已实施新生儿听力普遍筛查(UNHS)。在日本,每年约有27,000名新生儿(占新生儿总数的2.5%)通过公共资助项目接受筛查。虽然国外文献强调了评估的必要性,但在日本,这一点迄今尚未得到详细评估。
调查日本新生儿听力普遍筛查(UNHS)的效果。
我们使用两个标准来评估UNHS;筛查准确性和早期检测的有效性,并在主要医学和社会研究期刊数据库中搜索相关研究论文。共识别出11篇提供筛查测试准确性信息的文章和2篇提供早期检测有效性信息的文章。
1)在两项基于地区的研究中,分别对900名和1272名新生儿进行了筛查,各发现1例双侧CHL。在9项基于医院的项目中,检测人数从313人到1910人不等。没有一项研究针对最佳实践标准测量敏感性和特异性。2)两项研究表明早期干预可能有益,但均未提供确凿证据。
由于在生命早期难以对听力损失和正常听力进行鉴别诊断,且缺乏早期干预有效性的证据,日本新生儿听力普遍筛查(UNHS)的有效性仍不明确。在全国范围内实施UNHS之前,应充分调查和评估这些问题。