Klemetti E, Matela A-M, Haag P, Kononen M
Faculty of Dentistry, Kuwait University, Kuwait.
J Oral Rehabil. 2006 Jan;33(1):31-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2006.01531.x.
The objective of this study was to test inter-observer variability in shade selection for porcelain restorations, using three different shade guides: Vita Lumin Vacuum, Vita 3D-Master and Procera. Nineteen young dental professionals acted as observers. The results were also compared with those of a digital colorimeter (Shade Eye Ex; Shofu, Japan). Regarding repeatability, no significant differences were found between the three shade guides, although repeatability was relatively low (33-43%). Agreement with the colorimetric results was also low (8-34%). In conclusion, shade selection shows moderate to great inter-observer variation. In teaching and standardizing the shade selection procedure, a digital colorimeter may be a useful educational tool.
Vita Lumin Vacuum、Vita 3D-Master和Procera,测试烤瓷修复体比色时观察者间的差异。19名年轻牙科专业人员作为观察者。研究结果还与数字比色仪(Shade Eye Ex;日本松风株式会社)的结果进行了比较。关于可重复性,三种比色板之间未发现显著差异,尽管可重复性相对较低(33%-43%)。与比色计结果的一致性也较低(8%-34%)。总之,比色显示出中度到高度的观察者间差异。在比色程序的教学和标准化方面,数字比色仪可能是一种有用的教育工具。