Suppr超能文献

由新手牙科专业人员和色度计进行的比色。

Shade selection performed by novice dental professionals and colorimeter.

作者信息

Klemetti E, Matela A-M, Haag P, Kononen M

机构信息

Faculty of Dentistry, Kuwait University, Kuwait.

出版信息

J Oral Rehabil. 2006 Jan;33(1):31-5. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2006.01531.x.

Abstract

The objective of this study was to test inter-observer variability in shade selection for porcelain restorations, using three different shade guides: Vita Lumin Vacuum, Vita 3D-Master and Procera. Nineteen young dental professionals acted as observers. The results were also compared with those of a digital colorimeter (Shade Eye Ex; Shofu, Japan). Regarding repeatability, no significant differences were found between the three shade guides, although repeatability was relatively low (33-43%). Agreement with the colorimetric results was also low (8-34%). In conclusion, shade selection shows moderate to great inter-observer variation. In teaching and standardizing the shade selection procedure, a digital colorimeter may be a useful educational tool.

摘要

本研究的目的是使用三种不同的比色板

Vita Lumin Vacuum、Vita 3D-Master和Procera,测试烤瓷修复体比色时观察者间的差异。19名年轻牙科专业人员作为观察者。研究结果还与数字比色仪(Shade Eye Ex;日本松风株式会社)的结果进行了比较。关于可重复性,三种比色板之间未发现显著差异,尽管可重复性相对较低(33%-43%)。与比色计结果的一致性也较低(8%-34%)。总之,比色显示出中度到高度的观察者间差异。在比色程序的教学和标准化方面,数字比色仪可能是一种有用的教育工具。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验