Pfeiffer P, Schulz A, Nergiz I, Schmage P
Department of Prosthetic Dentistry, School of Oral Medicine, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
J Oral Rehabil. 2006 Jan;33(1):70-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2006.01526.x.
The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the yield strengths of glass fibre-reinforced composite (FRC) posts and zirconia dioxide ceramic (ZDC) posts. Tapered glass FRC posts (DentinPost) and ZDC posts (Cerapost) of three sizes in diameter (ISO 50, 90, 110) were used for bending tests. Conventional prefabricated titanium posts of the same sizes served as control groups. The 0.2% yield strengths (R(0.2)) were tested on a universal testing machine. As zirconia posts fractured before they were yielded 0.2%, the fracture strength instead of the yield strength was recorded for these posts. One-way and two-way anova and Bonferroni-Dunn's multiple comparison tests were performed for the statistical analysis. The mean 0.2% yield strengths of the posts were 27 +/- 1 N for glass fibre-reinforced posts and 58 +/- 4 N for zirconia posts of ISO 50 (control group: 54 +/- 3 N). For ISO 90 yield strengths of 52 +/- 4 N for glass fibre-reinforced posts, 117 +/- 20 N for zirconia posts and 117 +/- 11 N for the control group were obtained. For ISO 110 mean yield strengths amounted to 73 +/- 5 N for glass fibre-reinforced posts, 166 +/- 23 N for zirconia posts and 141 +/- 12 N for the control group. Significantly higher yield strength was recorded for the zirconia and the titanium posts compared with the glass fibre-reinforced posts for the tested ISO sizes.
本体外研究的目的是评估玻璃纤维增强复合材料(FRC)桩和二氧化锆陶瓷(ZDC)桩的屈服强度。使用三种直径尺寸(ISO 50、90、110)的锥形玻璃FRC桩(DentinPost)和ZDC桩(Cerapost)进行弯曲试验。相同尺寸的传统预制钛桩作为对照组。在万能试验机上测试0.2%屈服强度(R(0.2))。由于氧化锆桩在达到0.2%屈服之前就发生了断裂,因此记录这些桩的断裂强度而非屈服强度。进行单向和双向方差分析以及Bonferroni-Dunn多重比较试验以进行统计分析。对于ISO 50的桩,玻璃纤维增强桩的平均0.2%屈服强度为27±1 N,氧化锆桩为58±4 N(对照组:54±3 N)。对于ISO 90,玻璃纤维增强桩屈服强度为52±4 N,氧化锆桩为117±20 N,对照组为117±11 N。对于ISO 110,玻璃纤维增强桩平均屈服强度为73±5 N,氧化锆桩为166±23 N,对照组为141±12 N。对于测试的ISO尺寸,氧化锆桩和钛桩的屈服强度显著高于玻璃纤维增强桩。