Browne D L, Meeking D R, Allard S E, Munday J L, Shaw K M, Cummings M H
Academic Department of Diabetes and Endocrinology, Queen Alexandra Hospital, Portsmouth, UK.
Diabet Med. 2006 Jan;23(1):53-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2005.01727.x.
Previously, we have demonstrated that patients with normoalbuminuric Type 1 diabetes are characterized by impaired nitric oxide bioavailability compensated for by increased vasodilatory prostanoid-mediated vasodilation. Experimental evidence suggests vascular responses to endogenous angiotensin II involve the nitric oxide and prostaglandin pathways. We examined whether selective blockade of angiotensin II influences endothelial tone with particular reference to the nitric oxide/prostaglandin pathways in patients with Type 1 diabetes free from vascular complications.
At baseline, we studied changes in forearm blood flow in response to brachial arterial infusions of acetylcholine, l-NMMA, a combination of l-NMMA and the cyclo-oxygenase inhibitor indomethacin and nitroprusside in 30 patients with normoalbuminuric Type 1 diabetes [21 male, 9 female; age 38.5 +/- 1.9 years (mean +/- sem)]. Patients were randomized to 2 weeks' treatment with placebo or the selective angiotensin II receptor blocking agent irbesartan, 300 mg, prior to forearm vasoactive responses being re-examined.
The forearm responses to nitroprusside and acetylcholine were unchanged by both placebo (P = 0.23 and P = 0.36, respectively) and irbesartan (P = 0.41 and P = 0.36). Similarily, dose-response curves to acetylcholine in the presense of l-NMMA alone (P = 0.42) and a combination of l-NMMA and indomethacin (P = 0.44) were not altered by angiotensin II blockade.
This study demonstrated that physiological blockade of endogenous angiotensin II in Type 1 diabetes does not augment agonist-evoked vasodilation or the contribution of nitric oxides and prostanoids to endothelial tone.
此前,我们已经证明,正常白蛋白尿的1型糖尿病患者的特征是一氧化氮生物利用度受损,但通过增加血管舒张性前列腺素介导的血管舒张来代偿。实验证据表明,血管对内源性血管紧张素II的反应涉及一氧化氮和前列腺素途径。我们研究了选择性阻断血管紧张素II是否会影响内皮张力,特别是在无血管并发症的1型糖尿病患者中一氧化氮/前列腺素途径的情况。
在基线时,我们研究了30例正常白蛋白尿的1型糖尿病患者(21例男性,9例女性;年龄38.5±1.9岁[平均值±标准误])在肱动脉输注乙酰胆碱、L-NMMA、L-NMMA与环氧化酶抑制剂吲哚美辛的组合以及硝普钠后前臂血流的变化。在重新检查前臂血管活性反应之前,患者被随机分为接受安慰剂或选择性血管紧张素II受体阻断剂厄贝沙坦300mg治疗2周。
安慰剂(分别为P = 0.23和P = 0.36)和厄贝沙坦(P = 0.41和P = 0.36)对硝普钠和乙酰胆碱的前臂反应均未改变。同样,单独使用L-NMMA(P = 0.42)和L-NMMA与吲哚美辛联合使用(P = 0.44)时,乙酰胆碱的剂量-反应曲线也未因血管紧张素II阻断而改变。
本研究表明,1型糖尿病患者内源性血管紧张素II的生理性阻断不会增强激动剂诱发的血管舒张或一氧化氮和前列腺素对内皮张力的贡献。