Barbeau Elizabeth M, Li Yi, Calderon Patricia, Hartman Cathy, Quinn Margaret, Markkanen Pia, Roelofs Cora, Frazier Lindsay, Levenstein Charles
Centre for Community Based, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 44 Binney Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
Cancer Causes Control. 2006 Feb;17(1):53-61. doi: 10.1007/s10552-005-0271-0.
Blue-collar workers are more likely to smoke, smoke more heavily, and have less success in quitting compared to white-collar workers, and this occupational gap is growing over time. Effective smoking cessation interventions among blue-collar workers are needed to address growing class-based disparities.
We used a pre-post study design to test feasibility and effect size of a smoking cessation trial in a union apprenticeship training program for iron workers (n = 337). The 4-month intervention drew upon a health promotion-health protection model for smoking cessation among blue-collar workers. We conducted pairwise analyses to assess pre-post intervention differences in 7-day point prevalence smoking abstinence measured 1 month after intervention was completed. Additional secondary outcomes, including smoking frequency, intensity, intention and self-efficacy to quit, were also assessed.
Baseline smoking prevalence was 41%. We observed a 19.4% post-intervention quit rate among baseline smokers. There were statistically significant positive changes pre- and post-intervention in intention to quit smoking, self-efficacy to quit, and a reduction in the number of days smoked. Participation in pro-active intervention components was associated with a three-fold (OR = 3.0, 1.15, 7.83) increase in the likelihood of quitting. Overall, participation in intervention components was low.
Labor union apprenticeship programs represent a promising venue for smoking cessation interventions, particularly those that draw upon a health promotion-health protection model.
与白领相比,蓝领工人吸烟的可能性更高、烟瘾更大,且戒烟成功率更低,而且这种职业差距随着时间的推移在不断扩大。需要对蓝领工人采取有效的戒烟干预措施,以解决日益扩大的基于阶层的差异问题。
我们采用前后对照研究设计,对一项针对钢铁工人的工会学徒培训计划中的戒烟试验(n = 337)的可行性和效应大小进行测试。为期4个月的干预措施借鉴了蓝领工人戒烟的健康促进-健康保护模式。我们进行了成对分析,以评估干预完成1个月后测得的7天点流行率戒烟情况的干预前后差异。还评估了其他次要结果,包括吸烟频率、强度、戒烟意愿和自我效能感。
基线吸烟率为41%。我们观察到,基线吸烟者干预后的戒烟率为19.4%。干预前后在戒烟意愿、戒烟自我效能感以及吸烟天数减少方面存在统计学上显著的积极变化。参与积极干预成分与戒烟可能性增加三倍(OR = 3.0,1.15,7.83)相关。总体而言,干预成分的参与度较低。
工会学徒计划是戒烟干预的一个有前景的场所,特别是那些借鉴健康促进-健康保护模式的计划。