Duffy David M
Department of Dermatology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Dermatol Surg. 2005 Nov;31(11 Pt 2):1530-41. doi: 10.2310/6350.2005.31238.
The use of liquid silicone for soft tissue augmentation has been associated with a great deal of controversy and negative publicity. It is hoped that this monograph will clarify some of the substantive issues behind the controversy.
To outline and discuss the history, legal status, indications, contraindications, technique, and complications associated with the use of liquid silicone for soft tissue augmentation.
Impressions derived from a 22-year experience involving the treatment of over 3000 patients using liquid silicone are presented, along with data abstracted from the scientific and the lay literature.
Pure liquid silicone may be superior to any currently available agent in properly selected patients for permanent correction of certain types of defects. Physicians who use it, however, must be advised that the misuse of this agent or other materials masquerading as liquid silicone have created a pervasive climate of distrust and a veritable minefield of extraordinarily unpleasant medicolegal possibilities.
使用液态硅胶进行软组织填充引发了大量争议和负面报道。希望这本专著能澄清争议背后的一些实质性问题。
概述并讨论使用液态硅胶进行软组织填充的历史、法律地位、适应症、禁忌症、技术及并发症。
介绍了22年里使用液态硅胶治疗3000多名患者的经验所得，以及从科学文献和通俗文献中提取的数据。
对于某些类型缺陷的永久性矫正，在适当选择的患者中，纯液态硅胶可能优于任何现有制剂。然而，必须告知使用它的医生，滥用这种制剂或其他冒充液态硅胶的材料已造成了普遍的不信任氛围，以及一系列极其棘手的医学法律问题的雷区。
