• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童利用注视的时间维度来推断偏好。

Children's use of the temporal dimension of gaze for inferring preference.

作者信息

Einav Shiri, Hood Bruce M

机构信息

Department of Experimental Psychology, University of Bristol, Bristol, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Dev Psychol. 2006 Jan;42(1):142-52. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.42.1.142.

DOI:10.1037/0012-1649.42.1.142
PMID:16420124
Abstract

This study examined 4- and 5-year-olds' ability to spontaneously use the relative duration and frequency of another's object-directed gaze for inferring that person's preference. In Experiment 1, analysis revealed a strong age effect for judgment accuracy, which could not be accounted for by cue-monitoring proficiency. Reducing the saliency of the objects in Experiment 2 yielded significant improvement in the younger children's performance. Thus, at 4 years, children already show signs of attending to the temporal dimension of gaze for making mentalistic inferences of preferential liking, but their competence may be undermined by the object choices themselves. By 5 years, they appear to overcome this competition. The obtained developmental difference is discussed in terms of concurrent transitions in attention regulation.

摘要

本研究考察了4岁和5岁儿童自发利用他人指向物体的注视的相对持续时间和频率来推断该人偏好的能力。在实验1中,分析揭示了判断准确性上存在显著的年龄效应,这不能用线索监测能力来解释。在实验2中降低物体的显著性,使得年幼儿童的表现有了显著改善。因此,4岁时,儿童已表现出关注注视的时间维度以对偏好进行心理推断的迹象,但他们的能力可能会受到物体选择本身的影响。到5岁时,他们似乎克服了这种竞争。根据注意力调节的同步转变对所获得的发展差异进行了讨论。

相似文献

1
Children's use of the temporal dimension of gaze for inferring preference.儿童利用注视的时间维度来推断偏好。
Dev Psychol. 2006 Jan;42(1):142-52. doi: 10.1037/0012-1649.42.1.142.
2
Understanding the referential nature of looking: infants' preference for object-directed gaze.理解注视的指涉性质:婴儿对指向物体的目光的偏好。
Cognition. 2008 Aug;108(2):303-19. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.02.009. Epub 2008 Mar 26.
3
Targets and cues: gaze-following in children with autism.目标与线索:自闭症儿童的目光追随
J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 1998 Oct;39(7):951-62.
4
The effects of adults' affective expression and direction of visual gaze on 12-month-olds' visual preferences for an object following a 5-minute, 1-day, or 1-month delay.成人情感表达和视觉注视方向对 12 个月大的婴儿在 5 分钟、1 天或 1 个月延迟后对跟随物体的视觉偏好的影响。
Br J Dev Psychol. 2011 Mar;29(Pt 1):64-85. doi: 10.1348/026151010X512088.
5
Children's use of looking behavior as a cue to detect another's goal.儿童将注视行为作为线索来探测他人的目标。
Child Dev. 1998 Jun;69(3):692-705.
6
Joint attention: inferring what others perceive (and don't perceive).共同注意:推断他人所感知(以及未感知)的事物。
Conscious Cogn. 2008 Mar;17(1):339-49. doi: 10.1016/j.concog.2007.06.014. Epub 2007 Oct 26.
7
The rapid development of explicit gaze judgment ability at 3 years.3岁时显性注视判断能力的快速发展。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2009 Nov;104(3):296-312. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2009.06.004. Epub 2009 Jul 28.
8
Cue significance and response regulation in 3- to 6-year-old children's learning of multiple choice discrimination tasks.3至6岁儿童在多项选择题辨别任务学习中的线索显著性与反应调节
Dev Psychobiol. 1985 May;18(3):229-45. doi: 10.1002/dev.420180304.
9
Setting goals to switch between tasks: effect of cue transparency on children's cognitive flexibility.设定任务切换目标:线索透明度对儿童认知灵活性的影响。
Dev Psychol. 2009 May;45(3):782-97. doi: 10.1037/a0015409.
10
Gaze cues influence the allocation of attention in natural scene viewing.注视线索会影响自然场景观看中注意力的分配。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2006 Dec;59(12):2056-64. doi: 10.1080/17470210600917884.

引用本文的文献

1
Neural correlates of "social gaze" processing in high-functioning autism under systematic variation of gaze duration.社会注视加工的神经关联:在注视持续时间的系统变化下,高功能自闭症的表现。
Neuroimage Clin. 2013 Sep 3;3:340-51. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2013.08.014. eCollection 2013.
2
Children's knowledge of deceptive gaze cues and its relation to their actual lying behavior.儿童对欺骗性注视线索的认知及其与他们实际说谎行为的关系。
J Exp Child Psychol. 2009 Jun;103(2):117-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jecp.2008.06.005. Epub 2008 Aug 3.
3
The problem with using eye-gaze to infer desire: a deficit of cue inference in children with autism spectrum disorder?
使用眼神注视来推断欲望的问题:自闭症谱系障碍儿童在线索推断方面存在缺陷吗?
J Autism Dev Disord. 2007 Oct;37(9):1761-75. doi: 10.1007/s10803-006-0309-5. Epub 2006 Dec 8.