Day Troy, Park Andrew, Madras Neal, Gumel Abba, Wu Jianhong
Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.
Am J Epidemiol. 2006 Mar 1;163(5):479-85. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwj056. Epub 2006 Jan 18.
The isolation and treatment of symptomatic individuals, coupled with the quarantining of individuals that have a high risk of having been infected, constitute two commonly used epidemic control measures. Although isolation is probably always a desirable public health measure, quarantine is more controversial. Mass quarantine can inflict significant social, psychological, and economic costs without resulting in the detection of many infected individuals. The authors use probabilistic models to determine the conditions under which quarantine is expected to be useful. Results demonstrate that the number of infections averted (per initially infected individual) through the use of quarantine is expected to be very low provided that isolation is effective, but it increases abruptly and at an accelerating rate as the effectiveness of isolation diminishes. When isolation is ineffective, the use of quarantine will be most beneficial when there is significant asymptomatic transmission and if the asymptomatic period is neither very long nor very short.
对出现症状的个体进行隔离和治疗,以及对有高感染风险的个体进行检疫,是两种常用的疫情防控措施。虽然隔离可能始终是一项理想的公共卫生措施,但检疫更具争议性。大规模检疫可能会带来巨大的社会、心理和经济成本,却无法检测出许多感染者。作者使用概率模型来确定预计检疫有用的条件。结果表明,如果隔离有效,通过检疫避免的感染数量(每个初始感染者)预计会非常低,但随着隔离效果的减弱,这一数量会突然且加速增加。当隔离无效时,如果存在大量无症状传播,且无症状期既不很长也不太短,那么实施检疫将最为有益。