Bell David M
World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland.
Emerg Infect Dis. 2004 Nov;10(11):1900-6. doi: 10.3201/eid1011.040729.
The 2003 outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) was contained largely through traditional public health interventions, such as finding and isolating case-patients, quarantining close contacts, and enhanced infection control. The independent effectiveness of measures to "increase social distance" and wearing masks in public places requires further evaluation. Limited data exist on the effectiveness of providing health information to travelers. Entry screening of travelers through health declarations or thermal scanning at international borders had little documented effect on detecting SARS cases; exit screening appeared slightly more effective. The value of border screening in deterring travel by ill persons and in building public confidence remains unquantified. Interventions to control global epidemics should be based on expert advice from the World Health Organization and national authorities. In the case of SARS, interventions at a country's borders should not detract from efforts to identify and isolate infected persons within the country, monitor or quarantine their contacts, and strengthen infection control in healthcare settings.
2003年严重急性呼吸综合征(SARS)疫情的控制主要依靠传统公共卫生干预措施,如查找并隔离病例、对密切接触者进行检疫以及加强感染控制。“增加社交距离”措施及在公共场所佩戴口罩的独立有效性尚需进一步评估。关于向旅行者提供健康信息的有效性,现有数据有限。通过健康申报或在国际边境进行体温扫描对旅行者进行入境筛查,在发现SARS病例方面几乎没有文献记载的效果;出境筛查似乎稍有效一些。边境筛查在阻止患病人员出行及建立公众信心方面的价值仍未量化。控制全球疫情的干预措施应基于世界卫生组织和国家当局的专家建议。就SARS而言,一国边境的干预措施不应减损在国内识别和隔离感染者、监测或检疫其接触者以及加强医疗机构感染控制的努力。