• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

机组人员熟悉程度:操作经验、非技术性能与差错管理。

Crew familiarity: operational experience, non-technical performance, and error management.

作者信息

Thomas Matthew J W, Petrilli Renée M

机构信息

Centre for Applied Behavioural Science, University of South Australia, Woodville.

出版信息

Aviat Space Environ Med. 2006 Jan;77(1):41-5.

PMID:16422452
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Crew familiarity, in terms of having recent operational experience together as a crew, is seen as an important safety-related variable. However, little evidence exists to unpack the underlying processes with respect to familiarity. This study investigated the relationships between crew familiarity, non-technical performance, and error management.

METHOD

Data were collected during normal line operations at a commercial airline by observers using a methodology based on the Line Operations Safety Audit (LOSA). A total of 154 flights were analyzed, 31% of which were operated by an unfamiliar crew, with 69% operated by a familiar crew.

RESULTS

The rate of error occurrence was found to be higher for unfamiliar crews, and these crews were found to make different types of errors when compared with familiar crews. However, with respect to the management of error events, no significant difference was found between unfamiliar and familiar crews. No significant effect of crew familiarity was found with respect to crews' non-technical performance. However, strong correlations were found between crews' non-technical performance and the management of errors.

DISCUSSION

The findings indicate that crew familiarity, in terms of whether a crew has flown together recently or not, has little operational significance with respect to the management of error events during normal line operations. Accordingly, the suggestion that unfamiliar crews operate at a higher level of safety-related risk was not supported. Non-technical performance appears to be a stronger driver of effective error management than crew familiarity, and is highlighted as a focus for further investigation and intervention.

摘要

引言

机组人员的熟悉程度,即作为一个机组近期是否有共同的操作经验,被视为一个与安全相关的重要变量。然而,关于熟悉程度背后的潜在过程,几乎没有证据可循。本研究调查了机组人员熟悉程度、非技术性能和差错管理之间的关系。

方法

观察员在一家商业航空公司的正常航线运营期间,采用基于航线运营安全审计(LOSA)的方法收集数据。共分析了154个航班,其中31%由不熟悉的机组执行,69%由熟悉的机组执行。

结果

发现不熟悉的机组差错发生率更高,并且与熟悉的机组相比,这些机组会出现不同类型的差错。然而,在差错事件的管理方面,不熟悉和熟悉的机组之间没有发现显著差异。机组熟悉程度对机组人员的非技术性能没有显著影响。然而,机组人员的非技术性能与差错管理之间存在很强的相关性。

讨论

研究结果表明,就机组近期是否一起飞行而言,机组熟悉程度在正常航线运营期间对差错事件的管理几乎没有实际意义。因此,关于不熟悉的机组在与安全相关的风险更高水平上运行的建议未得到支持。非技术性能似乎比机组熟悉程度更能有效驱动差错管理,并且被强调为进一步调查和干预的重点。

相似文献

1
Crew familiarity: operational experience, non-technical performance, and error management.机组人员熟悉程度:操作经验、非技术性能与差错管理。
Aviat Space Environ Med. 2006 Jan;77(1):41-5.
2
Crew resource management: a simulator study comparing fixed versus formed aircrews.机组资源管理:一项比较固定机组与编队机组的模拟器研究。
Aviat Space Environ Med. 1996 Jan;67(1):3-7.
3
Captain's and first officers' spheres of influence.
CRM Advocate. 1994 Jan;94.1:16-8.
4
Communication as group process media of aircrew performance.
Aviat Space Environ Med. 1989 May;60(5):402-10.
5
Comparative issues in aviation and surgical crew resource management: (1) are we too solution focused?航空与外科手术团队资源管理中的比较问题:(1)我们是否过于关注解决方案?
ANZ J Surg. 2008 Aug;78(8):690-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2008.04619.x.
6
Human error and crew resource management failures in Naval aviation mishaps: a review of U.S. Naval Safety Center data, 1990-96.海军航空事故中的人为失误与机组资源管理故障:对美国海军安全中心1990 - 1996年数据的回顾
Aviat Space Environ Med. 1999 Dec;70(12):1147-51.
7
A classification on human factor accident/incident of China civil aviation in recent twelve years.近十二年中国民航人为因素事故/事件分类
Space Med Med Eng (Beijing). 2004 Oct;17(5):318-21.
8
Culture and error in space: implications from analog environments.太空中的文化与错误:模拟环境的启示
Aviat Space Environ Med. 2000 Sep;71(9 Suppl):A133-9.
9
The evolution of Crew Resource Management training in commercial aviation.商业航空中机组资源管理培训的发展历程。
Int J Aviat Psychol. 1999;9(1):19-32. doi: 10.1207/s15327108ijap0901_2.
10
Ground crew injuries and fatalities in U.S. commercial aviation, 1983-2004.1983 - 2004年美国商业航空地勤人员伤亡情况
Aviat Space Environ Med. 2005 Nov;76(11):1007-11.

引用本文的文献

1
Familiarity of the Surgeon-Anesthesiologist Dyad and Major Morbidity After High-Risk Elective Surgery.外科医生与麻醉医生的熟悉程度与高风险择期手术后的主要并发症
JAMA Surg. 2025 May 28. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2025.1386.
2
Hierarchical task analysis for identification of interrelationships between ergonomic, external disruption, and internal disruption in complex laparoscopic procedures.层次任务分析识别复杂腹腔镜手术中工效学、外部干扰和内部干扰之间的相互关系。
Surg Endosc. 2019 Nov;33(11):3673-3687. doi: 10.1007/s00464-018-06656-z. Epub 2019 Jan 30.
3
Relationships Between Expertise, Crew Familiarity and Surgical Workflow Disruptions: An Observational Study.
专业技能、团队熟悉度与手术流程中断之间的关系:一项观察性研究。
World J Surg. 2019 Feb;43(2):431-438. doi: 10.1007/s00268-018-4805-5.
4
A qualitative assessment of safe work practices in logging in the southern United States.美国南部伐木业安全工作实践的定性评估。
Am J Ind Med. 2017 Jan;60(1):58-68. doi: 10.1002/ajim.22656. Epub 2016 Oct 17.
5
Teammate familiarity and risk of injury in emergency medical services.紧急医疗服务中的队友熟悉度与受伤风险
Emerg Med J. 2016 Apr;33(4):280-5. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2015-204964. Epub 2015 Nov 27.
6
The association between weekly work hours, crew familiarity, and occupational injury and illness in emergency medical services workers.紧急医疗服务人员每周工作时长、团队熟悉程度与职业伤病之间的关联。
Am J Ind Med. 2015 Dec;58(12):1270-7. doi: 10.1002/ajim.22510. Epub 2015 Aug 25.
7
How familiar are clinician teammates in the emergency department?急诊科的临床医生队友之间有多熟悉?
Emerg Med J. 2015 Apr;32(4):258-62. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2013-203199. Epub 2013 Dec 18.