Antos David, Schneider-Brachert Wulf, Bästlein Elke, Hänel Christine, Haferland Christian, Buchner Michael, Meier Eberhard, Trump Friedrich, Stolte Manfred, Lehn Norbert, Bayerdörffer Ekkehard
Clinic for Pediatric Diseases, Ludwigs-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany.
Helicobacter. 2006 Feb;11(1):39-45. doi: 10.1111/j.0083-8703.2006.00375.x.
Failed primary anti-Helicobacter pylori therapy results in a high rate of antimicrobial resistance. This necessitates a search for new regimens to cure H. pylori infection. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of a new levofloxacin-containing 7-day triple therapy and to compare it with that of standard French triple therapy in patients with known H. pylori susceptibility to MET (metronidazole) and CLA (clarithromycin).
Sixty-one patients with documented antibiotic sensitivity (E-test) and an indication for anti-H. pylori treatment based on the Maastricht Consensus 2/2000 guidelines were randomized to receive either esomeprazole 2 x 40 mg, levofloxacin 2 x 500 mg, and amoxicillin 2 x 1 g for 7 days (ELA, n = 30), or esomeprazole 2 x 20 mg, clarithromycin 2 x 500 mg, and amoxicillin 2 x 1 g for 7 days (ECA, n = 31). A cure check was performed 4-6 weeks after conclusion of therapy.
Sixty-one patients were randomized to the two treatment groups. Twenty-eight of 30 patients of the ELA group were available for per-protocol (PP) analysis, of whom 26 (92.9% CI: 76-99%; intention-to-treat [ITT] analysis 86.7% CI: 68-96%) became H. pylori negative compared with 26 of the 31 patients of the ECA group (83.9%, CI: 66-93% both PP and ITT analyses). Five patients of the ELA group showed CLA resistance, three of whom also showed MET resistance, and all five were treated successfully. Two patients with levofloxacin-resistant strains, one in each group, were cured. Both regimens were generally well tolerated with minor adverse events being seen in 15 patients (51.7%) of the ELA group and in 13 (40.6%) of the ECA group. None of the patients discontinued treatment prematurely due to adverse events.
The data of this pilot study suggest a better than 80% efficacy of the new 7-day levofloxacin triple therapy, which is within the range of the French triple therapy in patients with MET- and CLA-susceptible strains. The data suggest that the new levofloxacin triple therapy may also be an option in patients with MET- and CLA-resistant H. pylori strains.
初次抗幽门螺杆菌治疗失败导致抗菌药物耐药率很高。这就需要寻找新的治疗方案来治愈幽门螺杆菌感染。本研究的目的是评估含左氧氟沙星的新的7天三联疗法的疗效和耐受性,并将其与标准法国三联疗法在已知幽门螺杆菌对甲硝唑(MET)和克拉霉素(CLA)敏感的患者中的疗效和耐受性进行比较。
61例有抗生素敏感性记录(E试验)且根据马斯特里赫特2/2000共识指南有抗幽门螺杆菌治疗指征的患者被随机分为两组,一组接受埃索美拉唑2×40mg、左氧氟沙星2×500mg和阿莫西林2×1g,疗程7天(ELA组,n = 30);另一组接受埃索美拉唑2×20mg、克拉霉素2×500mg和阿莫西林2×1g,疗程7天(ECA组,n = 31)。治疗结束后4 - 6周进行疗效检查。
61例患者被随机分入两个治疗组。ELA组30例患者中有28例可进行符合方案(PP)分析,其中26例(92.9%,置信区间:76 - 99%;意向性分析[ITT] 86.7%,置信区间:68 - 96%)幽门螺杆菌转为阴性,而ECA组31例患者中有26例(83.9%,PP分析和ITT分析的置信区间均为66 - 93%)。ELA组有5例患者显示对克拉霉素耐药,其中3例也显示对甲硝唑耐药,所有5例均治疗成功。两组各有1例对左氧氟沙星耐药菌株的患者被治愈。两种治疗方案总体耐受性良好,ELA组15例患者(51.7%)和ECA组13例患者(40.6%)出现轻微不良事件。没有患者因不良事件而提前终止治疗。
这项初步研究的数据表明,新的7天左氧氟沙星三联疗法的疗效优于80%,在对MET和CLA敏感菌株的患者中,其疗效与法国三联疗法相当。数据表明,新的左氧氟沙星三联疗法对于对MET和CLA耐药的幽门螺杆菌菌株的患者可能也是一种选择。