Guyatt Gordon, Baumann Michael, Pauker Stephen, Halperin Jonathan, Maurer Janet, Owens Douglas K, Tosteson Anna N A, Carlin Brian, Gutterman David, Prins Martin, Lewis Sandra Zelman, Schünemann Holger
Department of Medicine, HSC-2C12, McMaster University, 1200 Main St West, Hamilton, ON, Canada L8N 3Z5.
Chest. 2006 Jan;129(1):182-7. doi: 10.1378/chest.129.1.182.
Most panels that develop clinical practice guidelines are poorly equipped to address resource allocation or cost issues associated with management options. This risks neglect, arbitrariness, lack of transparency, and methodological flaws in consideration of resource allocation. We provide recommendations for guideline panels to promote greater transparency and rigor. We suggest focusing on resource allocation issues for only a limited number of recommendations and provide criteria for selecting those in which economic considerations are likely to influence the direction or strength of the recommendation. Panels should involve a health economist to assist with the systematic review and critical interpretation of relevant economic analyses. They should carefully define the intended audience and may consider issuing alternative recommendations when available resources vary widely across target clinical settings. Targeting a limited number of recommendations for the consideration of resource allocation issues, and ensuring methodologically high-quality review, will best serve guideline panels, and the health-care providers and patients they hope to assist.
大多数制定临床实践指南的小组在处理与管理方案相关的资源分配或成本问题时,能力欠佳。这有可能导致在考虑资源分配时出现忽视、任意性、缺乏透明度以及方法上的缺陷。我们为指南小组提供建议,以提高透明度和严谨性。我们建议仅针对有限数量的建议关注资源分配问题,并提供选择那些经济因素可能影响建议方向或力度的建议的标准。小组应邀请一位卫生经济学家协助对相关经济分析进行系统综述和批判性解读。他们应仔细界定目标受众,并在不同目标临床环境中可用资源差异很大时,考虑发布替代建议。针对有限数量的建议来考虑资源分配问题,并确保进行方法上高质量的综述,将最有利于指南小组以及他们希望帮助的医疗服务提供者和患者。