Schmitz V, Neumann U P, Puhl G, Tran Z V, Neuhaus P, Langrehr J M
Department of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Charite, Campus Virchow, Augustenburger Platz 1, Berlin, Germany.
Am J Transplant. 2006 Feb;6(2):379-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-6143.2005.01173.x.
Choledochojejunostomy (CJS) is commonly used for biliary reconstruction in liver transplantation for primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC). We alternatively performed choledochoduodenostomy (CDS) and side-to-side choledochodocholedochstomy in a large cohort of patients. Fifty-one patients with PSC, transplanted between 1988 and 2000, were analyzed retrospectively. Biliary reconstruction was CDS in 25 (49%), CJS in 20 (39%) and CC in 6 transplantations (12%). Biliary leaks occurred in the early follow-up (< or =41 days) only in CDS patients (20%). However, in the late follow-up (>4 months), stricturing of anastomosis was found once in CDS (4%) and CJS (5%). Later (>9 months), intrahepatic bile duct strictures were diagnosed in four CDS (16%), one CJS (5%) and one CC (17%) patient(s). In 48% of CDS (12/25), 60% of CJS (12/20) and 17% of CC (1/6) at least one incidence of cholangitis was observed. Overall, biliary complication rates were significantly higher in CDS (40%) than CJS (10%) and CC (17%); of those none in CC and 12% in CDS were anastomosis-related. Graft/patient survival showed no significant differences among groups. Based on our results we consider CJS the standard method for biliary reconstruction in PSC; however, in selected cases where CJS is difficult to accomplish because of previous surgery or for retransplantation, CDS may present an alternative technique.
胆管空肠吻合术(CJS)常用于原发性硬化性胆管炎(PSC)肝移植中的胆道重建。我们在一大群患者中采用了胆管十二指肠吻合术(CDS)和端侧胆管胆管吻合术作为替代方法。对1988年至2000年间接受移植的51例PSC患者进行了回顾性分析。胆道重建采用CDS的有25例(49%),CJS的有20例(39%),6例移植采用了CC(12%)。仅在CDS患者的早期随访(≤41天)中发生了胆漏(20%)。然而,在晚期随访(>4个月)中,CDS(4%)和CJS(5%)各有1例发生吻合口狭窄。之后(>9个月),4例CDS患者(16%)、1例CJS患者(5%)和1例CC患者(17%)被诊断为肝内胆管狭窄。在48%的CDS患者(12/25)、60%的CJS患者(12/20)和17%的CC患者(1/6)中至少观察到1次胆管炎发作。总体而言,CDS的胆道并发症发生率(40%)显著高于CJS(10%)和CC(17%);CC组无吻合口相关并发症,CDS组为12%。各组的移植物/患者生存率无显著差异。根据我们的结果,我们认为CJS是PSC胆道重建的标准方法;然而,在因既往手术或再次移植而难以完成CJS的特定病例中,CDS可能是一种替代技术。