Melchart Dieter, Streng Andrea, Hoppe Andrea, Brinkhaus Benno, Becker-Witt Claudia, Hammes Michael, Irnich Dominic, Hummelsberger Josef, Willich Stefan N, Linde Klaus
Centre for Complementary Medicine Research, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Acupunct Med. 2005 Dec;23(4):157-65. doi: 10.1136/aim.23.4.157.
The goal of this paper is to describe the characteristics of physicians and their interventions in a large, multicentre randomised trial of acupuncture for tension-type headache known as ART TTH, in order to enable acupuncturists to assess the study interventions.
Participating physicians were recruited whose qualifications met or surpassed those of physicians currently accredited for providing acupuncture by state health funding agencies in Germany. Semi-standardised treatment strategies for acupuncture and minimal acupuncture were developed in a consensus process with acupuncture experts. A total of 270 patients suffering from episodic or chronic tension-type headache were randomised to 12 sessions of semi-standardised acupuncture (three predefined 'basic' points, recommendations for additional points given, but individual choice of additional points possible), standardised minimal acupuncture (superficial needling of at least 5 of 10 predefined, bilateral, distant non-acupuncture points) or a waiting list. Forty two physicians, trained and experienced in acupuncture, from 28 centres in Germany participated in the trial.
The median duration of acupuncture training of trial physicians was 500 hours (range 140 to 1350 hours). Physicians had 10 (< 1 to 25) years acupuncture experience. The three 'basic' points (GB20, GB21 and LR3) were treated in 96%, 82% and 97% of sessions, respectively. Frequently treated optional points included LI4 (67%), SP6 (50%) and ST36 (46%). Ten of the 42 physicians stated that they would have treated patients differently outside the trial. The trial found a significant effect of acupuncture over waiting list but not over minimal acupuncture.
In general, trial physicians complied well with the predefined interventions. A relevant minority of participating trial physicians stated that they would have treated patients differently outside the trial.
本文旨在描述在一项名为ART TTH的大型多中心紧张型头痛针灸随机试验中医生的特征及其干预措施,以便针灸师能够评估该研究干预措施。
招募资质达到或超过德国国家卫生资助机构目前认可的针灸医生资质的参与医生。通过与针灸专家的共识过程,制定了半标准化针灸和微针疗法的治疗策略。共有270例发作性或慢性紧张型头痛患者被随机分为接受12次半标准化针灸治疗(三个预先定义的“基本”穴位,给出了额外穴位的建议,但额外穴位可由个人选择)、标准化微针疗法(对10个预先定义的双侧远端非穴位中的至少5个进行浅刺)或进入等候名单。来自德国28个中心的42名接受过针灸培训且经验丰富的医生参与了该试验。
试验医生的针灸培训中位时长为500小时(范围140至1350小时)。医生有10(<1至25)年的针灸经验。三个“基本”穴位(GB20、GB21和LR3)分别在96%、82%和97%的治疗疗程中被使用。经常使用的可选穴位包括LI4(67%)、SP6(50%)和ST36(46%)。42名医生中有10名表示,他们在试验外会采用不同的方式治疗患者。试验发现针灸治疗相对于等候名单有显著效果,但相对于微针疗法则没有。
总体而言,试验医生很好地遵循了预先定义的干预措施。相当一部分参与试验的医生表示,他们在试验外会采用不同的方式治疗患者。