Endres Heinz G, Böwing Gabriele, Diener Hans-Christoph, Lange Stefan, Maier Christoph, Molsberger Albrecht, Zenz Michael, Vickers Andrew J, Tegenthoff Martin
Department of Medical Informatics, Statistics and Epidemiology, Ruhr University Bochum, Universitaetsstr 150, D-44801 Bochum, Germany.
J Headache Pain. 2007 Oct;8(5):306-14. doi: 10.1007/s10194-007-0416-5. Epub 2007 Oct 23.
Acupuncture treatment is frequently sought for tension-type headache (TTH), but there is conflicting evidence as to its effectiveness. This randomised, controlled, multicentre, patient-and observer-blinded trial was carried out in 122 outpatient practices in Germany on 409 patients with TTH, defined as > or =10 headache days per month of which < or =1 included migraine symptoms. Interventions were verum acupuncture according to the practice of traditional Chinese medicine or sham acupuncture consisting of superficial needling at nonacupuncture points. Acupuncture was administered by physicians with specialist acupuncture training. Ten 30-min sessions were given over a six-week period, with additional sessions available for partial response. Response was defined as >50% reduction in headache days/month at six months and no use of excluded concomitant medication or other therapies. In the intent-to-treat analysis (all 409 patients), 33% of verum patients and 27% of sham controls (p=0.18) were classed as responders. Verum was superior to sham for most secondary endpoints, including headache days (1.8 fewer; 95% CI 0.6, 3.0; p=0.004) and the International Headache Society response criterion (66% vs. 55% response, risk difference 12%, 95% CI: 2%-21%; p=0.024).). The relative risk on the primary and secondary response criterion was very similar ( approximately 0.8); the difference in statistical significance may be due to differences in event rate. TTH improves after acupuncture treatment. However, the degree to which treatment benefits depend on psychological compared to physiological effects and the degree to which any physiological effects depend on needle placement and insertion depth are unclear.
紧张型头痛(TTH)患者经常寻求针灸治疗,但其有效性证据相互矛盾。这项随机、对照、多中心、患者和观察者双盲试验在德国122家门诊诊所对409例TTH患者进行,TTH定义为每月头痛天数≥10天,其中≤1天包括偏头痛症状。干预措施为按照中医实践进行的真针灸或在非穴位进行浅刺的假针灸。针灸由接受过专业针灸培训的医生实施。在六周内进行十次30分钟的治疗,部分缓解者可增加治疗次数。缓解定义为六个月时每月头痛天数减少>50%,且未使用排除的伴随药物或其他疗法。在意向性分析(所有409例患者)中,真针灸组33%的患者和假针灸对照组27%的患者(p=0.18)被归类为缓解者。在大多数次要终点方面,真针灸优于假针灸,包括头痛天数(减少1.8天;95%CI 0.6, 3.0;p=0.004)和国际头痛协会缓解标准(缓解率66%对55%,风险差异12%,95%CI:2%-21%;p=0.024)。在主要和次要缓解标准上的相对风险非常相似(约0.8);统计学显著性差异可能是由于事件发生率的差异。针灸治疗后TTH有所改善。然而,与生理效应相比,治疗益处依赖心理效应的程度以及任何生理效应依赖针刺位置和进针深度的程度尚不清楚。