Suppr超能文献

一项针对腰痛患者的针灸随机多中心试验中的干预措施与医生特征

Interventions and physician characteristics in a randomized multicenter trial of acupuncture in patients with low-back pain.

作者信息

Brinkhaus Benno, Witt Claudia M, Jena Susanne, Linde Klaus, Streng Andrea, Irnich Dominik, Hummelsberger Josef, Hammes Michael, Pach Daniel, Melchart Dieter, Willich Stefan N

机构信息

Institute of Social Medicine, Epidemiology, and Health Economics, Charité University Medical Center, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

J Altern Complement Med. 2006 Sep;12(7):649-57. doi: 10.1089/acm.2006.12.649.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Descriptions of the interventions used in acupuncture studies are often incomplete. The aim of this paper is to describe participating trial physicians and interventions in a randomised trial of acupuncture for low back pain.

DESIGN

Three-armed, randomized, controlled multicenter trial with 1-year follow-up. A total of 301 patients with low-back pain were randomized to 12 sessions of semistandardized acupuncture (at least six local and two distant points needled bilaterally from a selection of predefined points, but individual choice of additional body or ear acupuncture points possible), minimal acupuncture (superficial needling of at least 6 of 10 predefined, bilateral, distant nonacupuncture points), or a waiting list control (2 months no acupuncture followed by semistandardised acupuncture described above).

OUTCOME MEASURES

Participating trial physicians and interventions.

RESULTS

Forty-five (45) physicians specializing in acupuncture (mean age 44 +/- 7.8 years, 23 (51%) female) in 30 outpatient centers in Germany provided the interventions. The median duration of acupuncture training of trial physicians was 350 hours (range 140-2508). The most frequently reported Chinese diagnosis was Kidney deficiency (39%), followed by qi and Blood stagnation (24%), and bi syndrome (20%). The total number of needles used was 17.3 +/- 4.2 in the acupuncture group compared to 12.3 +/- 1.2 in the minimal acupuncture group. In total, 40 physicians (89%) stated that they would have treated patients similarly or in exactly the same way outside of the trial, whereas 5 (11%) stated that they would have treated patients differently.

CONCLUSIONS

For most trial physicians, the semistandardized acupuncture strategy used in this trial was an acceptable compromise for an efficacy study. However, a relevant minority of participating trial physicians stated that they would have treated patients differently outside of the trial.

摘要

目的

针灸研究中对所采用干预措施的描述往往不完整。本文旨在描述一项针对腰痛的针灸随机试验中参与试验的医生及干预措施。

设计

三臂随机对照多中心试验,随访1年。共有301例腰痛患者被随机分为三组,分别接受12次半标准化针灸治疗(从一组预先定义的穴位中双侧针刺至少六个局部穴位和两个远端穴位,但可额外自行选择身体或耳部穴位)、最小化针灸治疗(对10个预先定义的双侧远端非针灸穴位中的至少6个进行浅刺)或等待列表对照(2个月不进行针灸,随后接受上述半标准化针灸治疗)。

观察指标

参与试验的医生及干预措施。

结果

德国30个门诊中心的45名(平均年龄44±7.8岁,23名(51%)为女性)针灸专科医生提供了干预措施。试验医生的针灸培训中位时长为350小时(范围140 - 2508小时)。最常报告的中医诊断为肾虚(39%),其次是气滞血瘀(24%)和痹证(20%)。针灸组使用的针数为17.3±4.2根,而最小化针灸组为12.3±1.2根。共有40名医生(89%)表示在试验外他们会以相似或完全相同的方式治疗患者,而5名医生(11%)表示会采用不同的治疗方式。

结论

对于大多数试验医生而言,本试验中使用的半标准化针灸策略对于疗效研究是一种可接受的折衷方案。然而,有相当一部分参与试验的医生表示在试验外他们会采用不同的方式治疗患者。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验