Shyyan Roman, Masood Shahla, Badwe Rajendra A, Errico Kathleen M, Liberman Laura, Ozmen Vahit, Stalsberg Helge, Vargas Hernan, Vass László
Lviv Cancer Center, Lviv, Ukraine.
Breast J. 2006 Jan-Feb;12 Suppl 1:S27-37. doi: 10.1111/j.1075-122X.2006.00201.x.
In 2002 the Breast Health Global Initiative (BHGI) convened a panel of breast cancer experts and patient advocates to develop consensus recommendations for diagnosing breast cancer in countries with limited resources. The panel agreed on the need for a pathologic diagnosis, based on microscopic evaluation of tissue specimens, before initiating breast cancer treatment. The panel discussed options for pathologic diagnosis (fine-needle aspiration biopsy, core needle biopsy, and surgical biopsy) and concluded that the choice among these methods should be based on available tools and expertise. Correlation of pathology, clinical, and imaging findings was emphasized. A 2005 BHGI panel reaffirmed these recommendations and additionally stratified diagnostic and pathology methods into four levels--basic, limited, enhanced, and maximal--from lowest to highest resources. The minimal requirements (basic level) include a history, clinical breast examination, tissue diagnosis, and medical record keeping. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy was recognized as the least expensive reliable method of tissue sampling, and the need for comparing its clinical usefulness with that of core needle biopsy in the limited-resource setting was emphasized. Increasing resources (limited level) may enable diagnostic breast imaging (ultrasound +/- mammography), use of tests to evaluate for metastases, limited image-guided sampling, and hormone receptor testing. With more resources (enhanced level), diagnostic mammography, bone scanning, and an onsite cytologist may be possible. Mass screening mammography is introduced at the maximal-resource level. At all levels, increasing breast cancer awareness, diagnosing breast cancer at an early stage, training individuals to perform and interpret breast biopsies, and collecting statistics about breast cancer, resources, and competing priorities may improve breast cancer outcomes in countries with limited resources. Expertise in pathology was reaffirmed to be a key requirement for ensuring reliable diagnostic findings. Several approaches were again proposed for improving breast pathology, including training pathologists, establishing pathology services in centralized facilities, and organizing international pathology services.
2002年,全球乳腺癌倡议组织(BHGI)召集了一组乳腺癌专家和患者权益倡导者,就资源有限国家的乳腺癌诊断制定共识性建议。该小组一致认为,在开始乳腺癌治疗之前,需要基于组织标本的显微镜评估进行病理诊断。小组讨论了病理诊断的选项(细针穿刺活检、粗针穿刺活检和手术活检),并得出结论,这些方法的选择应基于可用工具和专业知识。强调了病理学、临床和影像学检查结果的相关性。2005年的BHGI小组重申了这些建议,并将诊断和病理方法从资源需求最低到最高分为四个级别——基础、有限、强化和最高。最低要求(基础级别)包括病史、临床乳腺检查、组织诊断和病历保存。细针穿刺活检被认为是最经济可靠的组织采样方法,并强调了在资源有限的情况下将其临床效用与粗针穿刺活检进行比较的必要性。资源增加(有限级别)可能使诊断性乳腺成像(超声±乳腺X线摄影)、评估转移的检测、有限的图像引导采样和激素受体检测成为可能。资源更多(强化级别)时,可能进行诊断性乳腺X线摄影、骨扫描并配备现场细胞病理学家。在资源最高级别引入大规模筛查乳腺X线摄影。在所有级别,提高乳腺癌意识、早期诊断乳腺癌、培训人员进行和解读乳腺活检以及收集有关乳腺癌、资源和相互竞争的优先事项的统计数据,可能会改善资源有限国家的乳腺癌治疗效果。再次强调病理学专业知识是确保可靠诊断结果的关键要求。还再次提出了几种改善乳腺病理学的方法,包括培训病理学家、在集中设施中建立病理服务以及组织国际病理服务。