Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2006 Jan;15(1):45-51. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-05-0349.
In an earlier publication, our evaluation of data from breast cancer screening programs in seven Swedish counties suggested a 40% reduction in incidence-based breast cancer mortality among women actually screened. In the current study, we expand the previous analysis from seven counties to 13 large areas within nine counties, including six of the original counties and seven additional areas, examine a longer period of follow-up (20-44 years), apply new analytic methods for the evaluation of incidence-based breast cancer mortality, and estimate the number needed to screen to save one life.
Data from six of the original counties (one being excluded as it does not yet have 10 years of follow-up after the initiation of screening), with increased follow-up, and seven additional large areas, within three counties, representing approximately 45% of Swedish women, provide information about age at diagnosis, age at death, and screening history for 542,187 women in the prescreening and 566,423 women in the screening epochs. Regardless of year of diagnosis, there were a total of 6,231 deaths due to breast cancer in the period of study as a whole. Of these, 4,778 were incidence-based deaths in the two epochs, i.e., death among cases diagnosed within either the prescreening or screening period. Data were analyzed using Poisson regression and adjusted, when necessary, for self-selection bias, contemporaneous changes in incidence, and changes in mortality independent of screening.
Attendance was uniformly high, averaging 75% in the screening epochs. Recall rates for assessment varied from 4% to 5% at the first round of screening and approximately 3% at later rounds. Detection rates averaged five breast cancers per 1,000 women screened in the first round, and four breast cancers per 1,000 women screened in subsequent rounds. There was a significant 45% reduction in incidence-based breast cancer mortality among screened women in the screening epoch relative to incidence-based breast cancer mortality in the prescreening epoch (relative risk, 0.55; 95% confidence intervals, 0.51-0.59). After adjusting for self-selection bias, there still was a significant 43% reduction in incidence-based breast cancer mortality associated with screening (relative risk, 0.57; 95% confidence intervals, 0.53-0.62).
These results indicate a reduction in breast cancer mortality of between 40% and 45% in association with screening, after adjustment for self-selection bias. These results were obtained with modest human costs: the number needed to screen to save one life was estimated as 472.
在早期的一篇出版物中,我们对瑞典七个县乳腺癌筛查项目的数据评估表明,实际接受筛查的女性中,基于发病率的乳腺癌死亡率降低了40%。在当前研究中,我们将先前的分析范围从七个县扩展到九个县内的13个大区域,包括原来的六个县和另外七个区域,研究更长的随访期(20 - 44年),应用新的分析方法评估基于发病率的乳腺癌死亡率,并估计挽救一条生命所需的筛查人数。
来自原来六个县(其中一个县因筛查开始后随访不足10年被排除)且随访期延长的数据,以及来自三个县内另外七个大区域的数据,这些数据代表了约45%的瑞典女性,提供了542,187名筛查前女性和566,423名筛查期女性的诊断年龄、死亡年龄和筛查史信息。在整个研究期间,无论诊断年份如何,共有6,231例乳腺癌死亡病例。其中,4,778例是两个时期基于发病率的死亡病例,即在筛查前或筛查期诊断的病例中的死亡病例。使用泊松回归分析数据,并在必要时针对自我选择偏倚、发病率的同期变化以及与筛查无关的死亡率变化进行调整。
筛查期的参与率普遍较高,平均为75%。第一轮筛查的评估召回率在4%至5%之间,后续轮次约为3%。第一轮筛查中,每1000名接受筛查的女性平均检测出5例乳腺癌,后续轮次中每1000名接受筛查的女性平均检测出4例乳腺癌。与筛查前时期基于发病率的乳腺癌死亡率相比,筛查期接受筛查的女性中基于发病率的乳腺癌死亡率显著降低了45%(相对风险,0.55;95%置信区间,0.51 - 0.59)。在调整自我选择偏倚后,与筛查相关的基于发病率的乳腺癌死亡率仍显著降低了43%(相对风险,0.57;95%置信区间,0.53 - 0.62)。
这些结果表明,在调整自我选择偏倚后,筛查可使乳腺癌死亡率降低40%至45%。这些结果是以适度的人力成本获得的:估计挽救一条生命所需的筛查人数为472人。