Suppr超能文献

利奈唑胺预防由口腔链球菌或粪肠球菌引起的实验性主动脉瓣心内膜炎。

Linezolid in prophylaxis against experimental aortic valve endocarditis due to Streptococcus oralis or Enterococcus faecalis.

作者信息

Athanassopoulos George, Pefanis Angelos, Sakka Vissaria, Iliopoulos Dimitrios, Perrea Despina, Giamarellou Helen

机构信息

Fourth Department of Internal Medicine, General Hospital Attikon, Athens University School of Medicine, Athens, Greece.

出版信息

Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2006 Feb;50(2):654-7. doi: 10.1128/AAC.50.2.654-657.2006.

Abstract

There are no experimental studies regarding the prophylactic efficacy of linezolid against infective endocarditis. Nonbacterial thrombotic endocarditis of the aortic valve was induced in rabbits by the insertion of a polyethylene catheter. Twenty-four hours later, animals were randomly assigned to a control group, and groups receiving either ampicillin (two doses of 40 mg/kg of body weight each, given intravenously, 2 h apart) or linezolid (a single per os dose of 75 mg/kg). The first dose of ampicillin and the single dose of linezolid were administered 0.5 and 1 h, respectively, prior to the intravenous inoculation of approximately 10(7) CFU of Streptococcus oralis or Enterococcus faecalis. Linezolid peak levels in rabbit serum were similar to the peak serum levels in humans following a 600-mg oral dose of linezolid. Linezolid prevented endocarditis in 87% of S. oralis-challenged rabbits (P < 0.001 versus controls; P = 0.026 versus ampicillin). In rabbits challenged with E. faecalis, linezolid prevented endocarditis in 73% (P = 0.003 versus controls; P = 0.049 versus ampicillin). Ampicillin prevented endocarditis due to S. oralis or due to E. faecalis in 47% (P = 0.005 versus controls) and in 30% (P = not significant versus controls) of the challenged animals, respectively. In conclusion, linezolid was effective as prophylaxis against endocarditis caused by a strain of S. oralis and to a lesser degree against that caused by a strain of E. faecalis. Its prophylactic efficacy was superior to that of ampicillin.

摘要

关于利奈唑胺预防感染性心内膜炎的疗效,目前尚无实验研究。通过插入聚乙烯导管在兔体内诱发主动脉瓣非细菌性血栓性心内膜炎。24小时后,将动物随机分为对照组,以及接受氨苄西林(静脉注射,每剂40mg/kg体重,分两次给药,间隔2小时)或利奈唑胺(口服单剂量75mg/kg)的组。在静脉接种约10(7)CFU的口腔链球菌或粪肠球菌之前,分别提前0.5小时和1小时给予第一剂氨苄西林和单剂量利奈唑胺。兔血清中利奈唑胺的峰值水平与口服600mg利奈唑胺后人类血清中的峰值水平相似。利奈唑胺可预防87%的口腔链球菌感染兔发生心内膜炎(与对照组相比,P<0.001;与氨苄西林相比,P=0.026)。在粪肠球菌感染的兔中,利奈唑胺可预防73%的心内膜炎(与对照组相比,P=0.003;与氨苄西林相比,P=0.049)。氨苄西林分别预防了47%(与对照组相比,P=0.005)和30%(与对照组相比,P无统计学意义)的口腔链球菌或粪肠球菌感染动物发生心内膜炎。总之,利奈唑胺作为预防由口腔链球菌菌株引起的心内膜炎有效,对粪肠球菌菌株引起的心内膜炎预防效果稍差。其预防效果优于氨苄西林。

相似文献

10
Failure of linezolid treatment for enterococcal endocarditis.利奈唑胺治疗肠球菌性心内膜炎失败。
Clin Infect Dis. 2003 Aug 1;37(3):e29-30. doi: 10.1086/375877. Epub 2003 Jul 16.

本文引用的文献

1
Surveillance of linezolid resistance in Germany, 2001-2002.2001 - 2002年德国利奈唑胺耐药性监测
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2005 Jan;11(1):39-46. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2004.01036.x.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验