Marriott R G, Neil W, Waddingham S
South Yorkshire Mental Health Trust, Calder Unit, Fieldhead Hospital, Ouchthorpe Lane, Wakefield, Yorkshire, UK, WF1 3SP.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006 Jan 25;2006(1):CD005580. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005580.
A large and growing number of older people across the world suffer from schizophrenia. Recommendations for their treatment are largely based on data extrapolated from studies of the use of antipsychotic medications in younger populations. In addition most manufacturers of such medications recommend prescription of reduced doses to the elderly. The evidence base for these assumptions is unclear and raises obvious questions regarding the appropriateness of such prescribing practice.
To find and assimilate good evidence of the effects of antipsychotic medication for treatment of schizophrenia in people over 65 years of age.
We searched the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group's Register (May 2003). We inspected references of all included studies for further trials and contacted relevant pharmaceutical companies.
All clinical randomised trials evaluating antipsychotic drugs for schizophrenia and schizophrenia-like psychoses in older people.
We extracted data independently. For homogenous dichotomous data, the random effects, relative risk (RR), and 95% confidence interval (CI) and, where appropriate, the numbers needed to treat (NNT) were calculated on an intention-to-treat basis. For continuous data, we calculated weighted mean differences (WMD).
Two hundred and fifty two elderly people with schizophrenia participated in three relevant randomised controlled studies. We were unable to extract usable data on quality of life, satisfaction, service use, or economic outcomes. One small study (n=18) compared thioridazine with remoxipride (RR leaving the study early 1.0 CI 0.07 to 13.6). A second study (n=175) compared risperidone with olanzapine. Global state 'not improved/worse' was not significantly different between treatments (n= 171, RR 1.26 CI 0.8 to 1.9); mental state PANSS total endpoint scores were also equivocal (n=171, RR 0.98 CI 0.76 to 1.26) as were all cognitive function tests. The third study (subset n=59) compared olanzapine with haloperidol and mental state change scores (BPRS WMD -3.60 CI -10.8 to 3.6; PANSS WMD -6.00 CI -18.3 to 6.3) were equivocal.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Antipsychotics may be widely used in the treatment of elderly people with schizophrenia, however, based on this systematic review, there are little robust data available to guide the clinician with respect to the most appropriate drug to prescribe. Clearly reported large short, medium and long-term randomised controlled trials with participants, interventions and primary outcomes that are familiar to those wishing to help elderly people with schizophrenia are long overdue.
全球有大量且数量不断增加的老年人患有精神分裂症。针对他们的治疗建议主要基于从年轻人群使用抗精神病药物的研究中推断出的数据。此外,此类药物的大多数制造商建议给老年人开较低剂量的处方。这些假设的证据基础尚不清楚,引发了关于这种处方做法是否恰当的明显问题。
寻找并整合关于抗精神病药物治疗65岁以上精神分裂症患者效果的有力证据。
我们检索了Cochrane精神分裂症研究组注册库(2003年5月)。我们检查了所有纳入研究的参考文献以寻找进一步的试验,并联系了相关制药公司。
所有评估抗精神病药物治疗老年人精神分裂症及精神分裂症样精神病的临床随机试验。
我们独立提取数据。对于同质二分数据,在意向性治疗基础上计算随机效应、相对风险(RR)和95%置信区间(CI),并在适当情况下计算治疗所需人数(NNT)。对于连续数据,我们计算加权平均差(WMD)。
252名老年精神分裂症患者参与了三项相关随机对照研究。我们无法提取关于生活质量、满意度、服务使用或经济结果的可用数据。一项小型研究(n = 18)比较了硫利达嗪与瑞莫必利(提前退出研究的RR为1.0,CI为0.07至13.6)。第二项研究(n = 175)比较了利培酮与奥氮平。治疗之间总体状态“未改善/更差”无显著差异(n = 171,RR为1.26,CI为0.8至1.9);精神状态PANSS总分终点得分也不明确(n = 171,RR为0.98,CI为0.76至1.26),所有认知功能测试结果也是如此。第三项研究(子集n = 59)比较了奥氮平与氟哌啶醇,精神状态变化得分(BPRS的WMD为-3.60,CI为-10.8至3.6;PANSS的WMD为-6.00,CI为-18.3至6.3)不明确。
抗精神病药物可能广泛用于治疗老年精神分裂症患者,然而,基于本系统评价,几乎没有有力数据可指导临床医生选择最合适的处方药物。早就应该开展明确报告的大型短期、中期和长期随机对照试验,参与者、干预措施和主要结局应让希望帮助老年精神分裂症患者的人熟悉。